I have been divorced for almost 6 yrs and my wife kept our kids. I have them on my health plan and I do pay child support. My ex wife currently got a better job and her insurance is way better than mine and we both agreed to take off my kids off my health insurance. The attorney general's office said no to the idea. I live in Texas, why isn't this possible if we both agreed to it? And yes, her premium is a little higher than mine.Do I have to keep kids on health plan after divorce?In many states, the non-custodial, or in your case, the Possessary Consevator, is required to carry the medical insurance. But, a percentage of the cost of the insurance is a deductible item off your child support, though I don't quite understand how they set the amount. You can do the calculation here.
http://www.alllaw.com/calculators/Childs鈥?/a>
To learn a father's rights, join Dads House in Yahoo Groups. It's free to join and you associate with other fathers going through the same thing.
http://Dads-House.org
Child Support Modifications %26amp; Arrears
Negotiating The System
http://ch11-Child_Support-Negotiating_Th鈥?/a>
Modifying The Order
http://Ch11c-Child_Support_Modifications鈥?/a>
Federal Handbook For Non-custodial Parents
http://Www.Pueblo.Gsa.Gov/Cic_Text/Famil鈥?/a>
Rebuttable Presumptions Modifications
http://Ch11d-Child_Support_Rebuttable_Pr鈥?/a>
Child Support Trust Funds
http://Ch11e-Child_Support_Trust_Funds.D鈥?/a>
Contempt Of Court Hearings
http://Ch11f-Child_Support_Contempt_Hear鈥?/a>
Retroactive Modifications Of Arrears
http://Docs.Dads-House.org/Federal_Child鈥?/a>
Tax Info
http://Ch11g-Child_Support-Income_Tax_Co鈥?/a>
When Support Orders End
http://Ch11h-Child_Support_Ends_At_What_鈥?/a>
Modifications Due to New Child
http://Ch11i-Child_Support_Adjust_Due_2_鈥?/a>
Modification Due Remarriage
http://Ch11l-Child_Support_Adjust-Income鈥?/a>
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\Do I have to keep kids on health plan after divorce?
its just the law. Both parents have to carry insurance. Sadly when you get the courts involved...they now tell you how to parent your children.Do I have to keep kids on health plan after divorce?If her premium is higher then please explain what is way better about it?
Unless your kids have some sort of specific illnesses where a more expensive health coverage makes sense for better treatment options, any basic health care should suffice so you stick with the cheapest one.
I would ask a lawyer-but I would think if it's 2 kids maybe agree to put 1 child on each of your plansDo I have to keep kids on health plan after divorce?Why are you asking the attorney general office? That's an agreement between the 2 of you. If you trust her to do the right thing, then go for it. However, if she is an vindictive women, it might be a good idea to keep things the way they are.Do I have to keep kids on health plan after divorce?
I'm divorced in Texas to.
When my ex had my kids, she kept them on her insurance. Hers was better. I paid extra c/s to cover it. That was approved by the court.
Now they live with me.
I don't see where the AG office would know about the change in the ins.
In NY BOTH parents must carry health insurance on the kids by LAW...sounds like Texas requires the same thing.Do I have to keep kids on health plan after divorce?
Read your divorce decree. If you're obligated to provide health insurance, it'll say so in the Decree. And, most well-drafted decrees cover this situation: if your ex's plan is better, y'all can agree to switch to hers, but now you're supposed to pay her back for the incremental premium for the kids in addition to regular child support. Usually, the Attorney General only gets involved if someone complains that they're not getting their child support.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Can a father's health insurance cover the prenatal care of the mother who is carrying the child & the delivery?
We are covered under separate health insurance plans by our respective employers (she has an HMO, I have a PPO-HSA). There is a local hospital and OB-GYN medical group that is considered to be amongst the best in our area; although insurance does not include the hospital and medical group in their network, mine does. Can the medical bills for the pre-natal care and delivery be covered under my insurance (considering that it as much my child as it is hers) even though has own health insurance that would cover the expenses from a different provider?Can a father's health insurance cover the prenatal care of the mother who is carrying the child %26amp; the delivery?If the father's insurance is an individual policy (not a family policy) then no, it would not cover the mother's medical expenses for anything, including prenatal delivery.
On the other hand, if you have a family policy (covering both of you) then she would be covered. I think she can elect to go under your coverage for the preganacy and delivery, even if she has her own coverage, as long as your policy covers both of you.
Your best bet is for you each to check with your respective insurance carriers.Can a father's health insurance cover the prenatal care of the mother who is carrying the child %26amp; the delivery?mother can only use the insurance that she is enrolled in.
On the other hand, if you have a family policy (covering both of you) then she would be covered. I think she can elect to go under your coverage for the preganacy and delivery, even if she has her own coverage, as long as your policy covers both of you.
Your best bet is for you each to check with your respective insurance carriers.Can a father's health insurance cover the prenatal care of the mother who is carrying the child %26amp; the delivery?mother can only use the insurance that she is enrolled in.
Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
You can no longer deny Health Care Insurance to a Child for a Pre-existing Condition.
Kids can now stay on their Parents Health Care Insurance until they turn 26 yrs old.
Insurance Companies can no longer deny coverage once a person gets sick.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?THANK YOU MR OBAMA
OBAMA 2012
GOD BLESS OUR PRESIDENT OBAMA AND OUR FIRST LADYDid you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
That is why insurance rates for all of us are multiplying.
That is why so many things previously covered by Medicare are not longer covered.
That is why, in spite of the Michel's 'health initiative' most insurance companies have stopped coverage for weight loss and quitting smoking programs.
You said 'Insurance Companies can no long deny coverage once a person get sick'. Surprise, surprise, most of these people do not pay for or have health insurance plans, most of these people are illegal immigrants. These kids from 18 to 26 years old can continue living non-productive lives, rebelling against parents that do not carry health insurance.
Dream Act: It's a nightmare and does nothing for U.S. citizens who has spent their lives living by the rules, paying their taxes and now losing their homes, jobs and depressingly living on food stamps and food banks.
This also seems another scheme for parents and teachers to diagnose and find doctors to declare their very young children with Attention Deficit Disorder and give them 'medication', not to help the children but to subdue their children and to receive more government subsidies' Case in point the Riley case now on Court TV where they finally overdosed and killed their two year old.
Progressives' and Obamas' goals seem to be to redistribute wealth to not just the in the U.S. but to all the progressive, poverty nations of the world.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?I'll go along with the clause that states that an insurer can not deny or cancel coverage for a condition that was previously covered under your existing contract.
Isn't that why we buy insurance in the first place?
The rest of it is a bunch of Marxist Socialist Power grabbing irresponsible crap.
Anyone can abuse power and distort laws if they a good enough shyster lawyer. Insurance Companies included, so we must consider both sides of each separate issue and place all aspects of these issues in perspective.
The Idiot Fool side of this is that piece of crap legislation this corrupt Marxist Administration passed in the first place.
Throw out the Congress and give America a chance to follow the Constitution for a change.
Somebody had to do something, when I got sick, and they realized I was going to cost them a lot of money, my health insurance provider figured out a way to retroactively cancel my health insurance. They refunded all of the premiums I paid, and then sent me a bill for all the claims they had paid.
And the Tea Bag Republicans claim that we have the best health care in the world, it may be, but only if you can pay for it.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?These are some of the only FEW good things that the Healthcare bill had. If only the dems had the guts to stand up to big business and the republicans and do the whole thing right. sigh***
@ pixie, The deal is your premiums went up because this bill did not address the fact that insurance companies have controlled the high costs of healthcare and needed to be stopped.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
Interesting. Have they done anything to lower costs?
This private coop thing from Republicans is really Frankenbill - the worst of both worlds.
They need to put public option back in - just expand Medicare or Romney care already, you twits, and get it done with.
If Obama wants National Health Care, he has to get rid of the health insurance companies.
There is no reason for any of us to be TAXED for Obama-care, and having to pay for health insurance too.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
yeah,i noticed it a few months ago when my premium went up a hundred dollars.now not only do you take taxes from my check to support the poor,now you tax my premiums and call it humanity.i call it stealing.
Thank GOD! Many American families have been waiting for this.
Cue the teabaggers:
'Obama hasn't done anything'.
You forgot premiums that have gone up as much as a 100%.
Thank goodness! There are too many families in this country that have needed this for so long.
And I hope you are aware of how much this free health care is going to cost us.
@@@
Kids can now stay on their Parents Health Care Insurance until they turn 26 yrs old.
Insurance Companies can no longer deny coverage once a person gets sick.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?THANK YOU MR OBAMA
OBAMA 2012
GOD BLESS OUR PRESIDENT OBAMA AND OUR FIRST LADYDid you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
That is why insurance rates for all of us are multiplying.
That is why so many things previously covered by Medicare are not longer covered.
That is why, in spite of the Michel's 'health initiative' most insurance companies have stopped coverage for weight loss and quitting smoking programs.
You said 'Insurance Companies can no long deny coverage once a person get sick'. Surprise, surprise, most of these people do not pay for or have health insurance plans, most of these people are illegal immigrants. These kids from 18 to 26 years old can continue living non-productive lives, rebelling against parents that do not carry health insurance.
Dream Act: It's a nightmare and does nothing for U.S. citizens who has spent their lives living by the rules, paying their taxes and now losing their homes, jobs and depressingly living on food stamps and food banks.
This also seems another scheme for parents and teachers to diagnose and find doctors to declare their very young children with Attention Deficit Disorder and give them 'medication', not to help the children but to subdue their children and to receive more government subsidies' Case in point the Riley case now on Court TV where they finally overdosed and killed their two year old.
Progressives' and Obamas' goals seem to be to redistribute wealth to not just the in the U.S. but to all the progressive, poverty nations of the world.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?I'll go along with the clause that states that an insurer can not deny or cancel coverage for a condition that was previously covered under your existing contract.
Isn't that why we buy insurance in the first place?
The rest of it is a bunch of Marxist Socialist Power grabbing irresponsible crap.
Anyone can abuse power and distort laws if they a good enough shyster lawyer. Insurance Companies included, so we must consider both sides of each separate issue and place all aspects of these issues in perspective.
The Idiot Fool side of this is that piece of crap legislation this corrupt Marxist Administration passed in the first place.
Throw out the Congress and give America a chance to follow the Constitution for a change.
Somebody had to do something, when I got sick, and they realized I was going to cost them a lot of money, my health insurance provider figured out a way to retroactively cancel my health insurance. They refunded all of the premiums I paid, and then sent me a bill for all the claims they had paid.
And the Tea Bag Republicans claim that we have the best health care in the world, it may be, but only if you can pay for it.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?These are some of the only FEW good things that the Healthcare bill had. If only the dems had the guts to stand up to big business and the republicans and do the whole thing right. sigh***
@ pixie, The deal is your premiums went up because this bill did not address the fact that insurance companies have controlled the high costs of healthcare and needed to be stopped.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
Interesting. Have they done anything to lower costs?
This private coop thing from Republicans is really Frankenbill - the worst of both worlds.
They need to put public option back in - just expand Medicare or Romney care already, you twits, and get it done with.
If Obama wants National Health Care, he has to get rid of the health insurance companies.
There is no reason for any of us to be TAXED for Obama-care, and having to pay for health insurance too.Did you know that some of the new Health Care Law goes into effect on Thursday?
yeah,i noticed it a few months ago when my premium went up a hundred dollars.now not only do you take taxes from my check to support the poor,now you tax my premiums and call it humanity.i call it stealing.
Thank GOD! Many American families have been waiting for this.
Cue the teabaggers:
'Obama hasn't done anything'.
You forgot premiums that have gone up as much as a 100%.
Thank goodness! There are too many families in this country that have needed this for so long.
And I hope you are aware of how much this free health care is going to cost us.
@@@
Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?
I keep finding conflicting information on the internet regarding the authority of state courts. I, as the custodial parent, am the sole provider for my child's health/dental insurance (I footed the bill for braces and any co-payments), I solely pay the mortgage for the house she lives in, father does not want to see or know his child and she is now 17 years old. He pays $500 per month in mandate child support from age 13 to 18 years of age. The court order says he is allowed to claim her on his taxes every other year. He pays no state tax where I pay state tax and an additional local tax which is equal to half of what I pay for state taxes. I also pay property taxes. I provide more than 50% of her support. Do I have to confirm to the judges order? Because the case was heard in the NCP's state, I was allowed to participate by phone but at the last minute the judge decided I couldn't and my child's father had his lawyer present where I had no one acting on my behalf.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?A judge can and in alot of cases does order this. Have you ever heard of a form 8332? The parent who has custody signs this paper in the year the other parent wants to claim the child. For example, if your ex gets the child on his 2006 taxes, you sign it in 2006 for him to use. Only catch is, it only releases dependancy and child tax credit, which your child is too old for, to the non custodial. You keep the Head of Household (if you qualify), the day care expenses, and the Earned Income credit (if you qualify). Hope this helps.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?
Contact a Lawyer ASAP I don't think he has a right.Good LuckCan a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?Yes, the judge can order whatever he thinks is equitable. In this case the non-custodial parent claims the exemption every other year and will use the single tax rates each year.
The custodial parent gets the best deal because they get the exemption every other year but get to use the "head of household" rates each year.
I know he can claim that he pays child support. My son's father has to have me fill something out or he has to go up to the friend of the court for them to fill out the papers for him to claim the child support he pays. I know he can claim that she doesn't live with him but he pays for support. You are also able to claim her. If you fill your taxes before he does and that you put she lives with you and you pay for all of her support but the five hundred you receive from him. You have to claim that he pays child support. But when he goes in to fill his taxes he will not be able to claim her as living with him. Because you already have. I would also go and see if you can have that taken care of. See how you have the papers changed. I hope i have helped some. I would also go and look up the laws for taxes.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?If the judge has jurisdiction over the divorce, he can decide which parent has the right to claim the child as part of the divorce decree. In the case you describe, you should be able to have the decree modified to give you the exemption. As others have said, contact an attorney.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?
You could file a petition through the court where the case was file for a modification due to not having representation at the prior case. Problem is she will turn 18 by the time they get to it.
Judges can order whatever they feel is just. You can request a modification, but unless a judge issues a contrary order, you have to follow the one in effect. And it might cost you more that you'd save on taxes, to fight it. Not fair, but life isn't sometimes.
If there is no court order regarding taking the exemption, the IRS rule is that it defaults to the custodial parent. But in your case, since there is a court order, you have to follow it. Filing first and claiming her, as someone else suggested, won't do you any good if her father claims her also - the IRS will contact both of you, he'll show the court order, and you'll have to pay the additional tax.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?
If there is a court order in place, you are out of luck as far as taxes go.
However, you could go back to court to try to have that changed.
My friend went to court and he is from florida and stays in alabama. The judge ordered him to pay child support and allows him to claim the children on taxes every year even though he doesn't get credit for them living with him. It's more for other reasons like going to school or getting state aid. He has to say on applications that he has two other dependents and pays out the axx in child support.
Contact a Lawyer ASAP I don't think he has a right.Good LuckCan a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?Yes, the judge can order whatever he thinks is equitable. In this case the non-custodial parent claims the exemption every other year and will use the single tax rates each year.
The custodial parent gets the best deal because they get the exemption every other year but get to use the "head of household" rates each year.
I know he can claim that he pays child support. My son's father has to have me fill something out or he has to go up to the friend of the court for them to fill out the papers for him to claim the child support he pays. I know he can claim that she doesn't live with him but he pays for support. You are also able to claim her. If you fill your taxes before he does and that you put she lives with you and you pay for all of her support but the five hundred you receive from him. You have to claim that he pays child support. But when he goes in to fill his taxes he will not be able to claim her as living with him. Because you already have. I would also go and see if you can have that taken care of. See how you have the papers changed. I hope i have helped some. I would also go and look up the laws for taxes.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?If the judge has jurisdiction over the divorce, he can decide which parent has the right to claim the child as part of the divorce decree. In the case you describe, you should be able to have the decree modified to give you the exemption. As others have said, contact an attorney.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?
You could file a petition through the court where the case was file for a modification due to not having representation at the prior case. Problem is she will turn 18 by the time they get to it.
Judges can order whatever they feel is just. You can request a modification, but unless a judge issues a contrary order, you have to follow the one in effect. And it might cost you more that you'd save on taxes, to fight it. Not fair, but life isn't sometimes.
If there is no court order regarding taking the exemption, the IRS rule is that it defaults to the custodial parent. But in your case, since there is a court order, you have to follow it. Filing first and claiming her, as someone else suggested, won't do you any good if her father claims her also - the IRS will contact both of you, he'll show the court order, and you'll have to pay the additional tax.Can a Florida judge order that a non-custodial parent be allowed to claim child on his taxes.?
If there is a court order in place, you are out of luck as far as taxes go.
However, you could go back to court to try to have that changed.
My friend went to court and he is from florida and stays in alabama. The judge ordered him to pay child support and allows him to claim the children on taxes every year even though he doesn't get credit for them living with him. It's more for other reasons like going to school or getting state aid. He has to say on applications that he has two other dependents and pays out the axx in child support.
What happens if someone is trying to claim another person's child on their taxes? What are the penalties?
My husband has a seven year old son who lives part of the time with his mother and her live-in boyfriend. Her boyfriend is insisting on covering the minor on his group health insurance and he is also claiming the child on his taxes as a dependent and getting the child tax credit every year. My understanding is that a child can only be claimed as a dependent if it is a biological, adopted, step or foster child. What would this be classified as? Fraud? And how would my husband go about proving this to the IRS?What happens if someone is trying to claim another person's child on their taxes? What are the penalties?The custodial parent is the one who can claim the child. The custodial parent is defined as the one with whom the child spent the most time with during the year. If that's not you then you have no claim to the child an cannot claim him unless you have a court decree that grants you the exemption or the custodial parent gives you a completed Form 8332 that you attach to your return.
A live-in boyfriend can claim the child if the child lived in his home ALL year and he provided more than half of the child's support for the year AND if the custodial parent earned less than $3,500 and does not claim him. If the b/f claims the child it will be up to him to prove his claim to the IRS. Since you apparently cannot claim the child, that's none of YOUR concern, however.
The IRS will not discuss the mother's or the boyfriend's tax return with you, nor will they likely act on "fraud" claims when former spouses and the children are involved unless YOU are entitled to claim the child on YOUR return.What happens if someone is trying to claim another person's child on their taxes? What are the penalties?Your thinking for EIC. If the child lives all yr with them and doesn't pay over 50% of their own living expenses and makes less than $3500 they can claim him. The child would be considered a qualified relative.What happens if someone is trying to claim another person's child on their taxes? What are the penalties?Let me add a few points to the good comments posted above.
You should probably consult a tax professional. Your husband can still file a return, claiming his son. but not by computer because the IRS computer will see that the son's SSN has already been used. You have to print a paper return and mail it in. The IRS will contact all the parties and figure out who is entitled to claim the boy as the dependent.
The good news is that you and your husband may get $1000 of your taxes for the child tax credit, plus another $400 to $800 for the dependent.
The bad news news is that it takes months for this happen.translate japanese to english
A live-in boyfriend can claim the child if the child lived in his home ALL year and he provided more than half of the child's support for the year AND if the custodial parent earned less than $3,500 and does not claim him. If the b/f claims the child it will be up to him to prove his claim to the IRS. Since you apparently cannot claim the child, that's none of YOUR concern, however.
The IRS will not discuss the mother's or the boyfriend's tax return with you, nor will they likely act on "fraud" claims when former spouses and the children are involved unless YOU are entitled to claim the child on YOUR return.What happens if someone is trying to claim another person's child on their taxes? What are the penalties?Your thinking for EIC. If the child lives all yr with them and doesn't pay over 50% of their own living expenses and makes less than $3500 they can claim him. The child would be considered a qualified relative.What happens if someone is trying to claim another person's child on their taxes? What are the penalties?Let me add a few points to the good comments posted above.
You should probably consult a tax professional. Your husband can still file a return, claiming his son. but not by computer because the IRS computer will see that the son's SSN has already been used. You have to print a paper return and mail it in. The IRS will contact all the parties and figure out who is entitled to claim the boy as the dependent.
The good news is that you and your husband may get $1000 of your taxes for the child tax credit, plus another $400 to $800 for the dependent.
The bad news news is that it takes months for this happen.
In Minnesota How old are u covered for health insurance?
on a Parents work-provided health plan how old does your child have to be to be covered is it after 18 they need to be in school to be covered? or are they covered until 21?In Minnesota How old are u covered for health insurance?....under the new health care if it passes your child can be insured up to age 26. Under the current plan.. you are carried under most insurances until 18 but if you are in college that lasts until 21 years of age.In Minnesota How old are u covered for health insurance?The real thing is do they own up the the fact that they have a very poorly child and face their company being forced to sack them.
Should you tell your child about a health scare?
I am a single mom of 2 great kids. I am having a lot of medical problems. I am having a hysterectomy soon due to tumours on my ovaries, and endometriosis. Should I tell my 9 year old son about my problems specifically, or sugar coat it to protect him and not to worry him in case there is no need for chemo or radiation. What to do? THis is a tough call, my son while not a typical 9 year old is very mature but, I don't want to put stress on him. He keeps asking about all my recent doctors appointments and I have surgery in less then 2 weeks. What do I say, if anything. Just don't know what to do this time.Should you tell your child about a health scare?i think you should sugar coat it because no matter how mature you think he is, HE IS STILL A 9 YEAR OLD KID. but if something does happen to you while your in surgery you should have someone who is real close to you and your kids let him know what happened they can sugar coat it to and just wait until he gets older to tell him.Should you tell your child about a health scare?
I would sugar coat it unless it's certain that it can't get better.
Other wise we wouldn't want to worry him for something that hopefully could turn out alright.
It might be hard to sugar coat it so say something realistic, but i wouldn't mention the tumors or anything.
He'l just stress out.
Your in my prayers, best of luck :)Should you tell your child about a health scare?I think you should sugar coat the truth but he ought to know the truth. Tell him what they're looking for, but that there is a good chance that they won't find anything to worry about. If you need chemo then you tell him the full truth, children have been being lied to for years and we don't need to do this to them, but in never hurt to leave a detail out here or there to protect them. I'm so sorry that this is happening to you and your family though, I pray that everything turns out alright.
My mom had cancer in her intestines and resulted in her having to do sugery. She didn't tell me what it was for before the surgery and she just kept saying that she had "small problems" but nothing very serious. In the end, everything worked out fine and she lives very healthily now. I was not traumatized because of it because i didn't think that she could die. I was about 8 at the time and at that age, one of my parent's death as the worst nightmare i could think of. I would relax and keep saying that it' nothing very serious. But if it does become a major problem (chemo and stuff required) i'd tell him about the problems (but dont say something like "son, im gonna die so bye bye")
I wish you good luck on your surgery and i will pray for you.Should you tell your child about a health scare?Don't sugar coat it.
here's the deal. If you let him know how bad it is then he won't be surprised if you do get chemo and He will have time to get used to the idea. If you don't have to get Chemo then awesome!! and he will be very grateful.
If you sugar coat it then he will be shocked and upset you didn't tell him in the first place. and he won't have the chance to get used to the idea. And maybe even do some research on different therapies or ways to help you out while you are getting whatever it is that you need.
You could actually take him to the doctor with you. Have the doc talk with him about what is going on.
It will actually be helpful to all of you to be able to talk about it openly. If you sugar coat it then you can't do that.Should you tell your child about a health scare?
Look. If he is asking U about the doctor's appointments, then he already knows something isn't right! And U not telling him (or sugar coating) IS NOT making him feel any better! He has all these ideas running thru his head about what could b wrong..w/no defined end! Sit him down %26amp; tell him the bare truth! Tell him what he can expect from this surgery (how long it will take, how long U will need to re-cooperate) and make sure to tell him what to expect after it. Tell him the possibility of chemo or radiation! Simply telling him these things will put his mind @ ease...cause now he knows what is wrong %26amp; what to expect! Answer ALL his ?s w/truth %26amp; honesty! Bet he takes it really well. And then it will b a HUGE weight off ur mind as well!
just tell him gently kids aren't stupid they know when something is wrong and he's probably worrying a lot right now just explain to him gently maybe not in great details or medical therm cause not knowing is probably stressing him more then if you told himShould you tell your child about a health scare?
You could die during surgery and you want to sugar coat it? Tell your son the truth.
sugar coat it. just tell him what you think is the best and keep the rest. Explain that to him when he's older. Good Luck on your surgery
I would sugar coat it unless it's certain that it can't get better.
Other wise we wouldn't want to worry him for something that hopefully could turn out alright.
It might be hard to sugar coat it so say something realistic, but i wouldn't mention the tumors or anything.
He'l just stress out.
Your in my prayers, best of luck :)Should you tell your child about a health scare?I think you should sugar coat the truth but he ought to know the truth. Tell him what they're looking for, but that there is a good chance that they won't find anything to worry about. If you need chemo then you tell him the full truth, children have been being lied to for years and we don't need to do this to them, but in never hurt to leave a detail out here or there to protect them. I'm so sorry that this is happening to you and your family though, I pray that everything turns out alright.
My mom had cancer in her intestines and resulted in her having to do sugery. She didn't tell me what it was for before the surgery and she just kept saying that she had "small problems" but nothing very serious. In the end, everything worked out fine and she lives very healthily now. I was not traumatized because of it because i didn't think that she could die. I was about 8 at the time and at that age, one of my parent's death as the worst nightmare i could think of. I would relax and keep saying that it' nothing very serious. But if it does become a major problem (chemo and stuff required) i'd tell him about the problems (but dont say something like "son, im gonna die so bye bye")
I wish you good luck on your surgery and i will pray for you.Should you tell your child about a health scare?Don't sugar coat it.
here's the deal. If you let him know how bad it is then he won't be surprised if you do get chemo and He will have time to get used to the idea. If you don't have to get Chemo then awesome!! and he will be very grateful.
If you sugar coat it then he will be shocked and upset you didn't tell him in the first place. and he won't have the chance to get used to the idea. And maybe even do some research on different therapies or ways to help you out while you are getting whatever it is that you need.
You could actually take him to the doctor with you. Have the doc talk with him about what is going on.
It will actually be helpful to all of you to be able to talk about it openly. If you sugar coat it then you can't do that.Should you tell your child about a health scare?
Look. If he is asking U about the doctor's appointments, then he already knows something isn't right! And U not telling him (or sugar coating) IS NOT making him feel any better! He has all these ideas running thru his head about what could b wrong..w/no defined end! Sit him down %26amp; tell him the bare truth! Tell him what he can expect from this surgery (how long it will take, how long U will need to re-cooperate) and make sure to tell him what to expect after it. Tell him the possibility of chemo or radiation! Simply telling him these things will put his mind @ ease...cause now he knows what is wrong %26amp; what to expect! Answer ALL his ?s w/truth %26amp; honesty! Bet he takes it really well. And then it will b a HUGE weight off ur mind as well!
just tell him gently kids aren't stupid they know when something is wrong and he's probably worrying a lot right now just explain to him gently maybe not in great details or medical therm cause not knowing is probably stressing him more then if you told himShould you tell your child about a health scare?
You could die during surgery and you want to sugar coat it? Tell your son the truth.
sugar coat it. just tell him what you think is the best and keep the rest. Explain that to him when he's older. Good Luck on your surgery
Any experience with PacificSource Health Plans covering Behavioral Therapies for children with Autism?
I am considering which group health plan to choose for my company, and have had mixed reviews regarding PacificSource Health Plans and their willingness to cover Behavioral Therapies for children with Autism.Any experience with PacificSource Health Plans covering Behavioral Therapies for children with Autism?Go to Yahoo Groups autism forums pertaining to behavioral techniques, ABA, etc. and ask them. I recovered my children only on biomedical treatments, which many have complained about not getting insurance coverage for as well. Since individuals with autism have immune dsyfunction, sensory integration disorder, and many pathogens and toxins, the doctors are billing under their medical problems and not saying autism since it is not yet recognized as a medical problem by mainstream. But thousands have been recovered by biomedical, so hopefully it will one day.
Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
I still have concerns about it, my child is 3 years old with no health conditions what so ever, but she had the seasonal vaccine every year.
What do you think?Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?My family became immune to H1N1 the all natural, mercury free way, before the vaccine came out. (Not that we would have ever gotten the vaccine, anyway). My 6 year old and I were sick for a few days. My husband and 2 year old didn't get sick at all.Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
I refuse to give my baby the shot too, and myself. it hasn't been around long enough, and not tested well enough for me to risk.Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?I think it is a personal choice and that you need to do your research and weigh the risks specific to your child . . . you have opted not to do it, your child is healthy and we appear to be past the worst of the H1N1 cases.
We did get our twins vaccinated - they are 16 months old, are in daycare for a few days a week, both my husband and I work in fields where we come into contact with a lot of people and most concerning, my daughter has a heart defect that makes any sort of respiratory infection extremely dangerous. We would rather chance the side effects than risk her catching H1N1 which could be fatal in her situation.
Both are fine - they have had 2 doses of the seasonal and H1N1 without any reactions . . . it was the right choice for us. That is all you can do as a parent, be as educated as possible and try to make the right choice for your family.
Best wishes.
ETA - The H1N1 was as tested as the regular seasonal flu vaccine and based on the same technology. The recall was due to the vaccine being a little too weak in the children's dosages . . . and to be truly protected the child either needed a stronger dosage or 2 dosages a month apart - not that they were dangerous in any way and even if you had gotten a less potent dosage and contracted H1N1, the symptoms are thought to be more mild than without the vaccine.
i didntAm I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?I didn't get the shot either, and my 3 kids (ages 2, 4, 6) didn't have it. My oldest actually got H1N1 a few months ago and it was really no big deal. She had a high fever for a couple days, no serious respiratory symptoms. I wouldn't worry too much about it if your child is relatively healthy.Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
You're definitely not the only one. There are thousands of parents who have chosen not to let their children have it. I'm 21 weeks pregnant and have a 16 month old son. The H1N1 vaccine is offered to children under 5 years and pregnant women in the UK where we are... but we're not having it. Then again, we don't have the seasonal flu vaccine anyway. Part of my reasoning was if we don't have the seasonal flu vaccine anyway (it's not even offered to us), why would we have another flu vaccine? I may think differently if we had flu vaccines normally.
the main problem with all these vaccinations is that the parents get a choice I believe it should be law that all children get these lifesaving injections no matter what the parents sayAm I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
My husband and I decided for my 6 month old son to not receive the H1N1. Our reseasons for our decision was, the H1N1 has not been out long so it hasnt been tested as good as other vaccines.
I didn't get it and refuse to give it to my child as well. If you recall a few weeks ago, there was actually a recall on a lot of those vaccines.
My daughter has all the routine vaccines, but doesnt have flu vaccines as they arnt on our routine vaccination lists in the UK - no babies have them unless specially requested
i didnt give the swine flu vaccine - its a new vaccine and you dont fully know the long term effects
no-one i know has had swine flu, and i hardly take my daughter random places, around random people
in my situation i think because we dont know the reprucussions of the vaccine and noone around me has ever had swine flu - i think its more of a risk than a benefit, unecesarry risk
I refuse to get it either. It came out much too fast and then to boot 800,000 doses of it were recalled for failure to work properly. If it was so "problem free" then why did they recall so much or for that matter, any at all??
While normally I am on board with vaccines for my child, this is one that we took a pass on. It has too many "ifs" in my mind to take the chance.
We have been invited to go next week and I asked for opinions on here aswell as doing research myself. The bigger percentage on here advised me not to, it is something I have thought and thought about and have decided against doing it. I have a 2 yr old and 4 yr old (the elder 2 have n't been invited for it yet). My 4 yr old has autism and doesn't speak so would be unable to tell us if he felt poorly after the jab, we live in a quite remote part of North Yorkshire so I am going keep an ear out but not vaccinate. It was the toughest decision so far!
I didn't get the vaccine for me or my daughter.
I felt that it was so new on the market, and that there was not enough research done on this vaccine!
Also, for the past 3 years, I have always gotten the seasonal flu shot, and ALWAYS ended up with the flu. My doctor advised me not to get anymore flu vaccines, and that I had a good chance of passing that on to my daughter. So we are very careful on what vaccines we put in our bodies!!!
nope....we arent getting it
No, I know several families who are not getting the vaccine, including mine. Read this article I wrote for information on how to protect you and your family from the vaccine without the vaccination:
http://www.ehow.com/how_5834182_keep-fam…
why wouldn't you?flu vaccine are very tried , its idiotic to claim there are issues with a flu shot like H1N1
its a flu strain that killed possibly 100 million people after world war 1
a responsible parent would get their child immunized
if H1N1 comes the seasonal vaccine wont help your dead child
be a responsible parent and get your child immunized
The CDC is confident in the safety of the H1N1 vaccine because it is very similar to the vaccine for the common flu, which has proven not to be dangerous to the majority of the population. The CDC currently recommends that pregnant women, caregivers, healthcare and medical personnel, be among the first to receive the 2009 H1N1 vaccine. Additionally recommended for vaccination
are all people between the ages of 6 months and 24 years as well as people ages 25 to 65 with health conditions associated with medical complications from influenza. The inoculation also comes in the form of a nasal spray, which can be risky for pregnant women and people with chronic medical conditions.
What do you think?Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?My family became immune to H1N1 the all natural, mercury free way, before the vaccine came out. (Not that we would have ever gotten the vaccine, anyway). My 6 year old and I were sick for a few days. My husband and 2 year old didn't get sick at all.Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
I refuse to give my baby the shot too, and myself. it hasn't been around long enough, and not tested well enough for me to risk.Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?I think it is a personal choice and that you need to do your research and weigh the risks specific to your child . . . you have opted not to do it, your child is healthy and we appear to be past the worst of the H1N1 cases.
We did get our twins vaccinated - they are 16 months old, are in daycare for a few days a week, both my husband and I work in fields where we come into contact with a lot of people and most concerning, my daughter has a heart defect that makes any sort of respiratory infection extremely dangerous. We would rather chance the side effects than risk her catching H1N1 which could be fatal in her situation.
Both are fine - they have had 2 doses of the seasonal and H1N1 without any reactions . . . it was the right choice for us. That is all you can do as a parent, be as educated as possible and try to make the right choice for your family.
Best wishes.
ETA - The H1N1 was as tested as the regular seasonal flu vaccine and based on the same technology. The recall was due to the vaccine being a little too weak in the children's dosages . . . and to be truly protected the child either needed a stronger dosage or 2 dosages a month apart - not that they were dangerous in any way and even if you had gotten a less potent dosage and contracted H1N1, the symptoms are thought to be more mild than without the vaccine.
i didntAm I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?I didn't get the shot either, and my 3 kids (ages 2, 4, 6) didn't have it. My oldest actually got H1N1 a few months ago and it was really no big deal. She had a high fever for a couple days, no serious respiratory symptoms. I wouldn't worry too much about it if your child is relatively healthy.Am I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
You're definitely not the only one. There are thousands of parents who have chosen not to let their children have it. I'm 21 weeks pregnant and have a 16 month old son. The H1N1 vaccine is offered to children under 5 years and pregnant women in the UK where we are... but we're not having it. Then again, we don't have the seasonal flu vaccine anyway. Part of my reasoning was if we don't have the seasonal flu vaccine anyway (it's not even offered to us), why would we have another flu vaccine? I may think differently if we had flu vaccines normally.
the main problem with all these vaccinations is that the parents get a choice I believe it should be law that all children get these lifesaving injections no matter what the parents sayAm I the only parent that didn’t give my child and I the H1N1 vaccines?
My husband and I decided for my 6 month old son to not receive the H1N1. Our reseasons for our decision was, the H1N1 has not been out long so it hasnt been tested as good as other vaccines.
I didn't get it and refuse to give it to my child as well. If you recall a few weeks ago, there was actually a recall on a lot of those vaccines.
My daughter has all the routine vaccines, but doesnt have flu vaccines as they arnt on our routine vaccination lists in the UK - no babies have them unless specially requested
i didnt give the swine flu vaccine - its a new vaccine and you dont fully know the long term effects
no-one i know has had swine flu, and i hardly take my daughter random places, around random people
in my situation i think because we dont know the reprucussions of the vaccine and noone around me has ever had swine flu - i think its more of a risk than a benefit, unecesarry risk
I refuse to get it either. It came out much too fast and then to boot 800,000 doses of it were recalled for failure to work properly. If it was so "problem free" then why did they recall so much or for that matter, any at all??
While normally I am on board with vaccines for my child, this is one that we took a pass on. It has too many "ifs" in my mind to take the chance.
We have been invited to go next week and I asked for opinions on here aswell as doing research myself. The bigger percentage on here advised me not to, it is something I have thought and thought about and have decided against doing it. I have a 2 yr old and 4 yr old (the elder 2 have n't been invited for it yet). My 4 yr old has autism and doesn't speak so would be unable to tell us if he felt poorly after the jab, we live in a quite remote part of North Yorkshire so I am going keep an ear out but not vaccinate. It was the toughest decision so far!
I didn't get the vaccine for me or my daughter.
I felt that it was so new on the market, and that there was not enough research done on this vaccine!
Also, for the past 3 years, I have always gotten the seasonal flu shot, and ALWAYS ended up with the flu. My doctor advised me not to get anymore flu vaccines, and that I had a good chance of passing that on to my daughter. So we are very careful on what vaccines we put in our bodies!!!
nope....we arent getting it
No, I know several families who are not getting the vaccine, including mine. Read this article I wrote for information on how to protect you and your family from the vaccine without the vaccination:
http://www.ehow.com/how_5834182_keep-fam…
why wouldn't you?flu vaccine are very tried , its idiotic to claim there are issues with a flu shot like H1N1
its a flu strain that killed possibly 100 million people after world war 1
a responsible parent would get their child immunized
if H1N1 comes the seasonal vaccine wont help your dead child
be a responsible parent and get your child immunized
The CDC is confident in the safety of the H1N1 vaccine because it is very similar to the vaccine for the common flu, which has proven not to be dangerous to the majority of the population. The CDC currently recommends that pregnant women, caregivers, healthcare and medical personnel, be among the first to receive the 2009 H1N1 vaccine. Additionally recommended for vaccination
are all people between the ages of 6 months and 24 years as well as people ages 25 to 65 with health conditions associated with medical complications from influenza. The inoculation also comes in the form of a nasal spray, which can be risky for pregnant women and people with chronic medical conditions.
Rh incompatibility rarely causes complications in a first pregnancy and does not affect the health?
why does it not affect the health of the mother or child in the 1st pregnancy? I understand why it does affect it in 2nd and beyound pregnancies! HelpRh incompatibility rarely causes complications in a first pregnancy and does not affect the health?If the blood from the Rh+ baby mixes with the Rh- blood of the mother the second pregnancy can be complicated because the mother's body will treat the 2nd fetus as a foreign body and try to get rid of it, causing miscarriage or birth defects. It does not happen with the 1st pregnancy because the blood does not mix until birth of the 1st child.Rh incompatibility rarely causes complications in a first pregnancy and does not affect the health?Because after the first pregnancy your body develops the antibodies that attack the fetus. You don't have those antibodies with your first pregnancy.italian translation to english
To give birth to a child,what level of semen and oestrogen should have to be there for male and female?
whether Amount of semen %26amp; oestrogen level decides the health and colour of the child?
can anybody tell me about this in detail?To give birth to a child,what level of semen and oestrogen should have to be there for male and female?women have many hormones besides estrogen that promote pregnancy. there are some to cause ovulation and some to cause periods. men have it simple as long as they have a sperm count above 5 million then they are likely to get a woman pregnant.
The most important hormones are made by the ovaries knon as female sex hormones (sex steroids) and the two main ones are oestrogen and progesterone
it is not the hormones itself that decide the race of the child but it is their parents.To give birth to a child,what level of semen and oestrogen should have to be there for male and female?No
But,
Ayurveda has a perfect way to get male or female child form its punsavan treatment and you can also get better child which is better in physical, mental and spiritual also from your other child.
http://lifecareayurveda.com/in鈥?/a>
can anybody tell me about this in detail?To give birth to a child,what level of semen and oestrogen should have to be there for male and female?women have many hormones besides estrogen that promote pregnancy. there are some to cause ovulation and some to cause periods. men have it simple as long as they have a sperm count above 5 million then they are likely to get a woman pregnant.
The most important hormones are made by the ovaries knon as female sex hormones (sex steroids) and the two main ones are oestrogen and progesterone
it is not the hormones itself that decide the race of the child but it is their parents.To give birth to a child,what level of semen and oestrogen should have to be there for male and female?No
But,
Ayurveda has a perfect way to get male or female child form its punsavan treatment and you can also get better child which is better in physical, mental and spiritual also from your other child.
http://lifecareayurveda.com/in鈥?/a>
Report Abuse
To give birth to a child,what level of semen and oestrogen should have to be there for male and female?You can fertilize an egg when it is in the uterus. Only the girl can give birth after gestation. Semen is pretty much the same day in, day out, the main factor in determining when the egg is fertilized is if the semen gets in the vagina, and the sperm is able to find an egg in the uterus to be fertilized. Color of the child is determined by the race or races of the parents.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
.... neglect their child emotionally? Like they provide food and shelter but do not care for the child's mental health or self-esteem?Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?No of course not!Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No way. You are a good parent if you can provide all of those things... mental health/self-esteem very much included in those things.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?i personally think that emotionally neglecting a child is not an act of a good parent.
emotions are important as well as basic necessities.
NoIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?Neglect is neglect any way you look at it, if a child is neglected emotionally they will have problems later on in life and it absolutely makes that parent bad.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No a good parent cares about the child well being, the mental stability, the love and neutering that is required in a children life, the love that is required,the comfort that the child feels, and protection that is needed.And that you will be there at all times for them.Being a parent requires a lot.
To be a good parent you need to be there for your child all the wayIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No..its better to have less material stuff,but have ALL the emotional love + support..if all is provided even better,but as you get older,you forget the material things and remember love + support.
Not at all. A cherished kid who might have to go hungry sometimes is, in my opinion, better off than a well-fed kid whose parents don't care about him.
No, if you neglect any of your child's needs then you are not doing your job as a parent. Children need basic thing (food, clothes, ect..) but it is also important to provide love, care and attention. There is not only physical abuse but also emotional neglect and abuse.
Since your Q%26amp;A's are private I can't be sure but you sound pretty young....12 or 13 I'd guess.. I do not mean to be rude at all but you might want to look at what you define as neglect. As being a teenager once myself I know emotions run high and I often felt mistreated (looking back now I may have been alittle, well alot, over dramatic) Talk to your parents about how you feel and how they may be hurting your feelings..it sounds like they may be making some hurtful comments about your appearance or intelligence, maybe they don't realize they're being so hard on you or that what may be ok to say to someone else rubs you the wrong way (everyone is different so thats totally normal)
I encourage you to talk to them..you might be surprised how much they don't realize what they're doing and how willing they are to work on it!
no they are not a good parent if they do that. This is called EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT. It can cause SERIOUS issues for the child. If you can't provide emotionally for your child you should give them to a loving home where ALL their needs are met. Children need to know how to love and that they are loved.
That's not a good parent. It takes nurturing to raise a child properly.
No way. You are a good parent if you can provide all of those things... mental health/self-esteem very much included in those things.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?i personally think that emotionally neglecting a child is not an act of a good parent.
emotions are important as well as basic necessities.
NoIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?Neglect is neglect any way you look at it, if a child is neglected emotionally they will have problems later on in life and it absolutely makes that parent bad.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No a good parent cares about the child well being, the mental stability, the love and neutering that is required in a children life, the love that is required,the comfort that the child feels, and protection that is needed.And that you will be there at all times for them.Being a parent requires a lot.
To be a good parent you need to be there for your child all the wayIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No..its better to have less material stuff,but have ALL the emotional love + support..if all is provided even better,but as you get older,you forget the material things and remember love + support.
Not at all. A cherished kid who might have to go hungry sometimes is, in my opinion, better off than a well-fed kid whose parents don't care about him.
No, if you neglect any of your child's needs then you are not doing your job as a parent. Children need basic thing (food, clothes, ect..) but it is also important to provide love, care and attention. There is not only physical abuse but also emotional neglect and abuse.
Since your Q%26amp;A's are private I can't be sure but you sound pretty young....12 or 13 I'd guess.. I do not mean to be rude at all but you might want to look at what you define as neglect. As being a teenager once myself I know emotions run high and I often felt mistreated (looking back now I may have been alittle, well alot, over dramatic) Talk to your parents about how you feel and how they may be hurting your feelings..it sounds like they may be making some hurtful comments about your appearance or intelligence, maybe they don't realize they're being so hard on you or that what may be ok to say to someone else rubs you the wrong way (everyone is different so thats totally normal)
I encourage you to talk to them..you might be surprised how much they don't realize what they're doing and how willing they are to work on it!
no they are not a good parent if they do that. This is called EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT. It can cause SERIOUS issues for the child. If you can't provide emotionally for your child you should give them to a loving home where ALL their needs are met. Children need to know how to love and that they are loved.
That's not a good parent. It takes nurturing to raise a child properly.
Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
Curious to know is there a health risk in a child that is bedwetting and inhailing residual urine smell ? I was with a friend at someone's home (who I've never met before) and the overwhelming scent of urine was coming out of the children's room, Is this harmful? Serious replies only please, I'm looking to inform the mother.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I have never heard of a health care risk of inhaling urine odor. I would however be concerned as to what kind of room the child is living in. It might be a risk on its own.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
Urine left in room temperature becomes ammonia. In a high enough concentration, inhaled ammonia can be bad for you, and an irritant to the skin. Not to mention that it is unsanitary, embarrasing, and gives these little kids the idea that it is ok to smell like pee. I can only imagine that all thier clothes and toys must smell like urine also. Concentrated urine will also discolor and rot fabric, and if the mattress never dries, it can become moldy, which can very quickly lead to serious health problems.
To get rid of the urine odor on the bed linens and other machine washable fabrics, put white vinegar into your washing machine's fabric softener dispenser. The vinegar neutralizes the urine, eliminating the smell. Run the rinse cycle twice. 1st time with just vinegar to remove the urine smell, 2nd time with just fabric softener to remove the vinegar smell.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I cannot imagine any harm from inhaling the smell.
Urine is essentially blood filtrate, and if you inhale it all it will do is end up back in your blood stream in miniscule amounts.
It can cause skin irritation though if left in contact for long periods, and more of a worry is why does a childs room smell of urine??Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
It isnt.
And sheltering a child from every single health risk possible is going to cause ALOT more harm than anything.
Because it stunts the immune system.
Think back to when you were a kid, all the things you did then. You're fine and healthy now. You werent afraid of touching everything in a public place, you didnt have instant hand sanitisers, etc etc.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I think the underlying problem of poor sanitation / housekeeping is of greater concern than the smell of urine. You might suggest she get her child a new mattress and fit it with a waterproof mattress cover to keep urine out of the mattress when the child wets the bed.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
I think it just stinks.
But if it sits, and then mold starts growing, now you are talking bad stuff.
Urine left in room temperature becomes ammonia. In a high enough concentration, inhaled ammonia can be bad for you, and an irritant to the skin. Not to mention that it is unsanitary, embarrasing, and gives these little kids the idea that it is ok to smell like pee. I can only imagine that all thier clothes and toys must smell like urine also. Concentrated urine will also discolor and rot fabric, and if the mattress never dries, it can become moldy, which can very quickly lead to serious health problems.
To get rid of the urine odor on the bed linens and other machine washable fabrics, put white vinegar into your washing machine's fabric softener dispenser. The vinegar neutralizes the urine, eliminating the smell. Run the rinse cycle twice. 1st time with just vinegar to remove the urine smell, 2nd time with just fabric softener to remove the vinegar smell.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I cannot imagine any harm from inhaling the smell.
Urine is essentially blood filtrate, and if you inhale it all it will do is end up back in your blood stream in miniscule amounts.
It can cause skin irritation though if left in contact for long periods, and more of a worry is why does a childs room smell of urine??Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
It isnt.
And sheltering a child from every single health risk possible is going to cause ALOT more harm than anything.
Because it stunts the immune system.
Think back to when you were a kid, all the things you did then. You're fine and healthy now. You werent afraid of touching everything in a public place, you didnt have instant hand sanitisers, etc etc.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I think the underlying problem of poor sanitation / housekeeping is of greater concern than the smell of urine. You might suggest she get her child a new mattress and fit it with a waterproof mattress cover to keep urine out of the mattress when the child wets the bed.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
I think it just stinks.
But if it sits, and then mold starts growing, now you are talking bad stuff.
Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
my parents want me to submit to drug testing. is it legal worldwide for doctors to tell parents everything about the child's medical health even if the child is 16 and requests that the doctor doesn't tell their parents???Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?What in the H.E.Double hockey sticks does being 16 have to do with it?
Adulthood begins at Eighteen. Unless you go get emancipated.
Your parents do not want you doing dope because they do not want you being a dope.
The fact that you are giving thumbs down to weveryone who is not telling you what you want to hear proves my point.
You are a child, and as such need someone to do your thinking for you. Especially if you are high.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
Depends on local laws. There is no global answer to this question. Generally, in the US, doctors are required to keep medical information confidential to everyone including parents after a certain age (I think 16 was the cutoff point, but not sure). Before that age, parents have a right to know the medical conditions of their children. Those who said "no matter what age" are incorrect. After all, should parents be kept in the dark about their 5 year-old child's medical conditions? I think not.
But to get an answer regarding your situation, find out what your local laws state.
Also, in some areas, you can purchase home drug test kits over the counter. No doctors need to get involved in that case.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?"worldwide"? lol
Every country has different standards as far as what information can be released to parents on their children. Heck, here in the US the standards vary from state to state.
That said, your parents cannot make you have a drug test especially if it is not medically necessary. I think they are just trying to scare you.
So, are you doing drugs?
Okay if you was even 12 and you did weed and you demanded the doctor tell nobody including parents he would keep it confidential so you got nothing to worry about.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?No, doctors must have a connection between their patients, under no circumstances can doctors tell any one else what a patient has told them in confidence.
You could take legal action if the doctor betrayed your trust
hope this helpsAre doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
No country gives minors control over their medical information. Your parents control until you're an adult.
Yes. It is perfectly legal, a 16 year old child is a minor. It would actually be illegal not to.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
You will have to specify your country to get a real answer to this.
There is no "worldwide" answer...
Yes, I believe it is. The age of consent (Legal Age) is 18 in most countries. At 18 you are on your own.
Absolutely not, you are the patient and the doctor has to respect your privacy no matter what your age.
Adulthood begins at Eighteen. Unless you go get emancipated.
Your parents do not want you doing dope because they do not want you being a dope.
The fact that you are giving thumbs down to weveryone who is not telling you what you want to hear proves my point.
You are a child, and as such need someone to do your thinking for you. Especially if you are high.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
Depends on local laws. There is no global answer to this question. Generally, in the US, doctors are required to keep medical information confidential to everyone including parents after a certain age (I think 16 was the cutoff point, but not sure). Before that age, parents have a right to know the medical conditions of their children. Those who said "no matter what age" are incorrect. After all, should parents be kept in the dark about their 5 year-old child's medical conditions? I think not.
But to get an answer regarding your situation, find out what your local laws state.
Also, in some areas, you can purchase home drug test kits over the counter. No doctors need to get involved in that case.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?"worldwide"? lol
Every country has different standards as far as what information can be released to parents on their children. Heck, here in the US the standards vary from state to state.
That said, your parents cannot make you have a drug test especially if it is not medically necessary. I think they are just trying to scare you.
So, are you doing drugs?
Okay if you was even 12 and you did weed and you demanded the doctor tell nobody including parents he would keep it confidential so you got nothing to worry about.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?No, doctors must have a connection between their patients, under no circumstances can doctors tell any one else what a patient has told them in confidence.
You could take legal action if the doctor betrayed your trust
hope this helpsAre doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
No country gives minors control over their medical information. Your parents control until you're an adult.
Yes. It is perfectly legal, a 16 year old child is a minor. It would actually be illegal not to.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
You will have to specify your country to get a real answer to this.
There is no "worldwide" answer...
Yes, I believe it is. The age of consent (Legal Age) is 18 in most countries. At 18 you are on your own.
Absolutely not, you are the patient and the doctor has to respect your privacy no matter what your age.
Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
AARP lost MANY members by backing Obama care %26amp; there is that lil thing about getting ready for death and all...Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?Rather sad and pathetic to see a sitting President attempt to politicize education for his own personal gain . Its an indicator that Obama is breaking and grasping at straws its the moral equivalent of a grown man taking a teenager to the big dance.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
Nothing worse than preparing for the end of life. Just ask any estate planning attorney.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?the kids are the only ones gullible enough to believe this nonsense anymore - even the liberals have wised up and turned on him.
LOL! I guess he'll take it wherever he can get it!
edit - Justine...great answer!Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?Believe it or not, Obama can actually do more than one thing at a time.
Education is one of his big priorities. He knows how important his mother's commitment to his education has been to his life, and he hopes to inspire others to stay in school, study, and learn.
As for end of life counseling, if the AARP members understood what's actually in the bills rather than what FOX has told them is in there they would have supported it wholeheartedly. I have yet to talk to anyone who wants to be kept alive on life support for weeks or years after they would have died naturally just because they didn't have clear instructions for their doctors and family members.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
How many members did they lose and what percentage of their subscribers is it?
As one pundit said on tv last hour, he is forced to go preach to the kids who really WERE born yesterday and might believe him.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
Truthfully the President is attempting to reach out to our youth because among industrialized nations our kids are the poorest performing and apparently the most undereducated. An American child going up against a Belgian, German, Indian, Japanese, or Chinese kid is like bringing a feather to a gunfight. You're kid will make them laugh as they mow him down.
Obama knows that targeting youth is part of his overall organizing strategy and he's taking another time slot to get it done.
Wow, you really are blond aren't you? You're out of date sweetheart, those death panel rumors were debunked weeks ago. The only people who still believe them also believe in gnomes and fairies.
Barry O has been unable to get adults to believe what he is selling so he is looking for an group he can influence so he is going after "future" voters. What he does not understand is parents see through he ruse and are either opting their children out or the schools are pulling the plug and making it optional. Poor Poor Barry, lots of hot air and nothing to inflate---but his own ego.
the seniors aren't done yet. everything you have today is because of what someone did in the past
Yes, he's trying to get the children's vote! You're a political genius!
Kids can't vote, Brainiac. And very few adults get their political opinions from their kids.
Try again.
could be however I think he is recruiting for his civilian defense corps
He is going to send them all coloring books like Kim Jong ll would do in NKorea. Start the indoctrination.
I wouldn't doubt thats part of it, but I think this is another bonehead, "fly Air Force One by Ground Zero for a photo op" idea by some WH flunky %26amp; Barry signed on. Come on, Barry! Rreach out to kids, near 9-11, like Bush was with kids? Parallels are striking. BHO needs some new publicity advisors.
Ahhh..the kid thing is a cheap ploy to make more of Bush with kids in school on 911. As usual, barry has to glitz it up %26amp; do ALL schools. It gets his face in front of impressionable kids who can't tell when they're being used %26amp; is a great propaganda tool. Tho' this one may backfire if enough parents ekeep their kiods home. I hope so.
%26amp; on the health care front, it takes attention away.
Kids are the only ones that will sit enraptured %26amp; not make a big fuss.
He's got to start the brainwashing early if he expects them to willingly become Soylent Green when they're 35.
nikki has a good point,but she needs a motorcycle like yours,,,I agree with her on this one. That Air Force One over new york was pure crap....dnmexican food
Nothing worse than preparing for the end of life. Just ask any estate planning attorney.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?the kids are the only ones gullible enough to believe this nonsense anymore - even the liberals have wised up and turned on him.
LOL! I guess he'll take it wherever he can get it!
edit - Justine...great answer!Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?Believe it or not, Obama can actually do more than one thing at a time.
Education is one of his big priorities. He knows how important his mother's commitment to his education has been to his life, and he hopes to inspire others to stay in school, study, and learn.
As for end of life counseling, if the AARP members understood what's actually in the bills rather than what FOX has told them is in there they would have supported it wholeheartedly. I have yet to talk to anyone who wants to be kept alive on life support for weeks or years after they would have died naturally just because they didn't have clear instructions for their doctors and family members.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
How many members did they lose and what percentage of their subscribers is it?
As one pundit said on tv last hour, he is forced to go preach to the kids who really WERE born yesterday and might believe him.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
Truthfully the President is attempting to reach out to our youth because among industrialized nations our kids are the poorest performing and apparently the most undereducated. An American child going up against a Belgian, German, Indian, Japanese, or Chinese kid is like bringing a feather to a gunfight. You're kid will make them laugh as they mow him down.
Obama knows that targeting youth is part of his overall organizing strategy and he's taking another time slot to get it done.
Wow, you really are blond aren't you? You're out of date sweetheart, those death panel rumors were debunked weeks ago. The only people who still believe them also believe in gnomes and fairies.
Barry O has been unable to get adults to believe what he is selling so he is looking for an group he can influence so he is going after "future" voters. What he does not understand is parents see through he ruse and are either opting their children out or the schools are pulling the plug and making it optional. Poor Poor Barry, lots of hot air and nothing to inflate---but his own ego.
the seniors aren't done yet. everything you have today is because of what someone did in the past
Yes, he's trying to get the children's vote! You're a political genius!
Kids can't vote, Brainiac. And very few adults get their political opinions from their kids.
Try again.
could be however I think he is recruiting for his civilian defense corps
He is going to send them all coloring books like Kim Jong ll would do in NKorea. Start the indoctrination.
I wouldn't doubt thats part of it, but I think this is another bonehead, "fly Air Force One by Ground Zero for a photo op" idea by some WH flunky %26amp; Barry signed on. Come on, Barry! Rreach out to kids, near 9-11, like Bush was with kids? Parallels are striking. BHO needs some new publicity advisors.
Ahhh..the kid thing is a cheap ploy to make more of Bush with kids in school on 911. As usual, barry has to glitz it up %26amp; do ALL schools. It gets his face in front of impressionable kids who can't tell when they're being used %26amp; is a great propaganda tool. Tho' this one may backfire if enough parents ekeep their kiods home. I hope so.
%26amp; on the health care front, it takes attention away.
Kids are the only ones that will sit enraptured %26amp; not make a big fuss.
He's got to start the brainwashing early if he expects them to willingly become Soylent Green when they're 35.
nikki has a good point,but she needs a motorcycle like yours,,,I agree with her on this one. That Air Force One over new york was pure crap....dn
If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?
We have the fattest poor people on the planet.
Why do we inflame this situation by subsidizing lunch programs?If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?Nope, means they actually are fed. granted they don't get to eat the good stuff that middle class families and enjoy but they don't go to bed hungry. If they did then they wouldn't be turning down free food.If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?They won't eat this food. I've seen it. All that food will end up in a landfill.If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?yes, their stomach will not tolerate health food,If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?
Link?
Why do we inflame this situation by subsidizing lunch programs?If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?Nope, means they actually are fed. granted they don't get to eat the good stuff that middle class families and enjoy but they don't go to bed hungry. If they did then they wouldn't be turning down free food.If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?They won't eat this food. I've seen it. All that food will end up in a landfill.If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?yes, their stomach will not tolerate health food,If a low-income child turns down a free school meal because it was health food: Were they really starving?
Link?
Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?
By doing so, you would provide the child with proper drinking water, schooling, and health care. It's gratifying.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?Yes i have. I wanted to do it last year but i found out you have to sort of adopt them, they don't live with you but you have to sustain them until they turn 18 years old. So i'm gonna wait until i'm older %26amp; i have a stable job %26amp; high income to do so because i would really like to.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?
Not through the big foundations where a lot of my money would be going to pay for the business aspect but I have thought of giving money to something like the uncultured project where my money will actually do more good.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?Yes I have. In fact, I get newsletters sent to me now and then from World Vision. I would do so when I'm older once I get a stable job and income. It is a small gesture but it really changes their lives.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?
No, because I doubt they would get my money.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?Only if shes17Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?
No i dont
No, do I look like charity?
Not through the big foundations where a lot of my money would be going to pay for the business aspect but I have thought of giving money to something like the uncultured project where my money will actually do more good.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?Yes I have. In fact, I get newsletters sent to me now and then from World Vision. I would do so when I'm older once I get a stable job and income. It is a small gesture but it really changes their lives.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?
No, because I doubt they would get my money.Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?Only if shes17Have you ever considered sponsoring a child in a third world country?
No i dont
No, do I look like charity?
Can I get health insurance only for my young children?
Their dad and I already have insurance elsewhere that works for us, but it's too expensive to add the children (we work for small companies), so we want to buy separate health insurance for them. Can one do that, or does there always have to be a parent on the insurance plan?Can I get health insurance only for my young children?Yes you can buy health Ins that way.Can I get health insurance only for my young children?
You should be able to get it just for them, im glad your trying to get it for them you never know when u might need itCan I get health insurance only for my young children?Well of course you can it is offered in every state!!Can I get health insurance only for my young children?
Depends on where you live. In Illinios you could. We have a state wide child health insurance plan. I think it's called Healthy Kids or possibilely Kid Care.You would have to check with your local government to find out if this is avalible to you.Can I get health insurance only for my young children?no you can get your child there own. just shop around. you can call the local health department they might have a list of different health insurances.Can I get health insurance only for my young children?
Here http://wiz.sc/Ifp4G2 is an article i found on health insurance with information and tips etc. Hope it helps.
We did that with our daughter. My husband and I each had a policy through our work and it was outrageous to add her, so we got her her own policy through blue cross blue shield. Worked well for us, it was affordable as well, and a parent was NOT required to be on the policy.
You should be able to get it just for them, im glad your trying to get it for them you never know when u might need itCan I get health insurance only for my young children?Well of course you can it is offered in every state!!Can I get health insurance only for my young children?
Depends on where you live. In Illinios you could. We have a state wide child health insurance plan. I think it's called Healthy Kids or possibilely Kid Care.You would have to check with your local government to find out if this is avalible to you.Can I get health insurance only for my young children?no you can get your child there own. just shop around. you can call the local health department they might have a list of different health insurances.Can I get health insurance only for my young children?
Here http://wiz.sc/Ifp4G2 is an article i found on health insurance with information and tips etc. Hope it helps.
We did that with our daughter. My husband and I each had a policy through our work and it was outrageous to add her, so we got her her own policy through blue cross blue shield. Worked well for us, it was affordable as well, and a parent was NOT required to be on the policy.
Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
.... neglect their child emotionally? Like they provide food and shelter but do not care for the child's mental health or self-esteem?Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?No of course not!Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No way. You are a good parent if you can provide all of those things... mental health/self-esteem very much included in those things.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?i personally think that emotionally neglecting a child is not an act of a good parent.
emotions are important as well as basic necessities.
NoIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?Neglect is neglect any way you look at it, if a child is neglected emotionally they will have problems later on in life and it absolutely makes that parent bad.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No a good parent cares about the child well being, the mental stability, the love and neutering that is required in a children life, the love that is required,the comfort that the child feels, and protection that is needed.And that you will be there at all times for them.Being a parent requires a lot.
To be a good parent you need to be there for your child all the wayIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No..its better to have less material stuff,but have ALL the emotional love + support..if all is provided even better,but as you get older,you forget the material things and remember love + support.
Not at all. A cherished kid who might have to go hungry sometimes is, in my opinion, better off than a well-fed kid whose parents don't care about him.
No, if you neglect any of your child's needs then you are not doing your job as a parent. Children need basic thing (food, clothes, ect..) but it is also important to provide love, care and attention. There is not only physical abuse but also emotional neglect and abuse.
Since your Q%26amp;A's are private I can't be sure but you sound pretty young....12 or 13 I'd guess.. I do not mean to be rude at all but you might want to look at what you define as neglect. As being a teenager once myself I know emotions run high and I often felt mistreated (looking back now I may have been alittle, well alot, over dramatic) Talk to your parents about how you feel and how they may be hurting your feelings..it sounds like they may be making some hurtful comments about your appearance or intelligence, maybe they don't realize they're being so hard on you or that what may be ok to say to someone else rubs you the wrong way (everyone is different so thats totally normal)
I encourage you to talk to them..you might be surprised how much they don't realize what they're doing and how willing they are to work on it!
no they are not a good parent if they do that. This is called EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT. It can cause SERIOUS issues for the child. If you can't provide emotionally for your child you should give them to a loving home where ALL their needs are met. Children need to know how to love and that they are loved.
That's not a good parent. It takes nurturing to raise a child properly.
No way. You are a good parent if you can provide all of those things... mental health/self-esteem very much included in those things.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?i personally think that emotionally neglecting a child is not an act of a good parent.
emotions are important as well as basic necessities.
NoIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?Neglect is neglect any way you look at it, if a child is neglected emotionally they will have problems later on in life and it absolutely makes that parent bad.Is someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No a good parent cares about the child well being, the mental stability, the love and neutering that is required in a children life, the love that is required,the comfort that the child feels, and protection that is needed.And that you will be there at all times for them.Being a parent requires a lot.
To be a good parent you need to be there for your child all the wayIs someone still considered a good parent if they provide all of the necessary things for their child but?
No..its better to have less material stuff,but have ALL the emotional love + support..if all is provided even better,but as you get older,you forget the material things and remember love + support.
Not at all. A cherished kid who might have to go hungry sometimes is, in my opinion, better off than a well-fed kid whose parents don't care about him.
No, if you neglect any of your child's needs then you are not doing your job as a parent. Children need basic thing (food, clothes, ect..) but it is also important to provide love, care and attention. There is not only physical abuse but also emotional neglect and abuse.
Since your Q%26amp;A's are private I can't be sure but you sound pretty young....12 or 13 I'd guess.. I do not mean to be rude at all but you might want to look at what you define as neglect. As being a teenager once myself I know emotions run high and I often felt mistreated (looking back now I may have been alittle, well alot, over dramatic) Talk to your parents about how you feel and how they may be hurting your feelings..it sounds like they may be making some hurtful comments about your appearance or intelligence, maybe they don't realize they're being so hard on you or that what may be ok to say to someone else rubs you the wrong way (everyone is different so thats totally normal)
I encourage you to talk to them..you might be surprised how much they don't realize what they're doing and how willing they are to work on it!
no they are not a good parent if they do that. This is called EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT. It can cause SERIOUS issues for the child. If you can't provide emotionally for your child you should give them to a loving home where ALL their needs are met. Children need to know how to love and that they are loved.
That's not a good parent. It takes nurturing to raise a child properly.
Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
Curious to know is there a health risk in a child that is bedwetting and inhailing residual urine smell ? I was with a friend at someone's home (who I've never met before) and the overwhelming scent of urine was coming out of the children's room, Is this harmful? Serious replies only please, I'm looking to inform the mother.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I have never heard of a health care risk of inhaling urine odor. I would however be concerned as to what kind of room the child is living in. It might be a risk on its own.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
Urine left in room temperature becomes ammonia. In a high enough concentration, inhaled ammonia can be bad for you, and an irritant to the skin. Not to mention that it is unsanitary, embarrasing, and gives these little kids the idea that it is ok to smell like pee. I can only imagine that all thier clothes and toys must smell like urine also. Concentrated urine will also discolor and rot fabric, and if the mattress never dries, it can become moldy, which can very quickly lead to serious health problems.
To get rid of the urine odor on the bed linens and other machine washable fabrics, put white vinegar into your washing machine's fabric softener dispenser. The vinegar neutralizes the urine, eliminating the smell. Run the rinse cycle twice. 1st time with just vinegar to remove the urine smell, 2nd time with just fabric softener to remove the vinegar smell.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I cannot imagine any harm from inhaling the smell.
Urine is essentially blood filtrate, and if you inhale it all it will do is end up back in your blood stream in miniscule amounts.
It can cause skin irritation though if left in contact for long periods, and more of a worry is why does a childs room smell of urine??Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
It isnt.
And sheltering a child from every single health risk possible is going to cause ALOT more harm than anything.
Because it stunts the immune system.
Think back to when you were a kid, all the things you did then. You're fine and healthy now. You werent afraid of touching everything in a public place, you didnt have instant hand sanitisers, etc etc.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I think the underlying problem of poor sanitation / housekeeping is of greater concern than the smell of urine. You might suggest she get her child a new mattress and fit it with a waterproof mattress cover to keep urine out of the mattress when the child wets the bed.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
I think it just stinks.
But if it sits, and then mold starts growing, now you are talking bad stuff.luigi games
Urine left in room temperature becomes ammonia. In a high enough concentration, inhaled ammonia can be bad for you, and an irritant to the skin. Not to mention that it is unsanitary, embarrasing, and gives these little kids the idea that it is ok to smell like pee. I can only imagine that all thier clothes and toys must smell like urine also. Concentrated urine will also discolor and rot fabric, and if the mattress never dries, it can become moldy, which can very quickly lead to serious health problems.
To get rid of the urine odor on the bed linens and other machine washable fabrics, put white vinegar into your washing machine's fabric softener dispenser. The vinegar neutralizes the urine, eliminating the smell. Run the rinse cycle twice. 1st time with just vinegar to remove the urine smell, 2nd time with just fabric softener to remove the vinegar smell.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I cannot imagine any harm from inhaling the smell.
Urine is essentially blood filtrate, and if you inhale it all it will do is end up back in your blood stream in miniscule amounts.
It can cause skin irritation though if left in contact for long periods, and more of a worry is why does a childs room smell of urine??Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
It isnt.
And sheltering a child from every single health risk possible is going to cause ALOT more harm than anything.
Because it stunts the immune system.
Think back to when you were a kid, all the things you did then. You're fine and healthy now. You werent afraid of touching everything in a public place, you didnt have instant hand sanitisers, etc etc.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?I think the underlying problem of poor sanitation / housekeeping is of greater concern than the smell of urine. You might suggest she get her child a new mattress and fit it with a waterproof mattress cover to keep urine out of the mattress when the child wets the bed.Health Risk of Children Inhaling urine ?
I think it just stinks.
But if it sits, and then mold starts growing, now you are talking bad stuff.
Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
my parents want me to submit to drug testing. is it legal worldwide for doctors to tell parents everything about the child's medical health even if the child is 16 and requests that the doctor doesn't tell their parents???Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?What in the H.E.Double hockey sticks does being 16 have to do with it?
Adulthood begins at Eighteen. Unless you go get emancipated.
Your parents do not want you doing dope because they do not want you being a dope.
The fact that you are giving thumbs down to weveryone who is not telling you what you want to hear proves my point.
You are a child, and as such need someone to do your thinking for you. Especially if you are high.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
Depends on local laws. There is no global answer to this question. Generally, in the US, doctors are required to keep medical information confidential to everyone including parents after a certain age (I think 16 was the cutoff point, but not sure). Before that age, parents have a right to know the medical conditions of their children. Those who said "no matter what age" are incorrect. After all, should parents be kept in the dark about their 5 year-old child's medical conditions? I think not.
But to get an answer regarding your situation, find out what your local laws state.
Also, in some areas, you can purchase home drug test kits over the counter. No doctors need to get involved in that case.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?"worldwide"? lol
Every country has different standards as far as what information can be released to parents on their children. Heck, here in the US the standards vary from state to state.
That said, your parents cannot make you have a drug test especially if it is not medically necessary. I think they are just trying to scare you.
So, are you doing drugs?
Okay if you was even 12 and you did weed and you demanded the doctor tell nobody including parents he would keep it confidential so you got nothing to worry about.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?No, doctors must have a connection between their patients, under no circumstances can doctors tell any one else what a patient has told them in confidence.
You could take legal action if the doctor betrayed your trust
hope this helpsAre doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
No country gives minors control over their medical information. Your parents control until you're an adult.
Yes. It is perfectly legal, a 16 year old child is a minor. It would actually be illegal not to.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
You will have to specify your country to get a real answer to this.
There is no "worldwide" answer...
Yes, I believe it is. The age of consent (Legal Age) is 18 in most countries. At 18 you are on your own.
Absolutely not, you are the patient and the doctor has to respect your privacy no matter what your age.
Adulthood begins at Eighteen. Unless you go get emancipated.
Your parents do not want you doing dope because they do not want you being a dope.
The fact that you are giving thumbs down to weveryone who is not telling you what you want to hear proves my point.
You are a child, and as such need someone to do your thinking for you. Especially if you are high.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
Depends on local laws. There is no global answer to this question. Generally, in the US, doctors are required to keep medical information confidential to everyone including parents after a certain age (I think 16 was the cutoff point, but not sure). Before that age, parents have a right to know the medical conditions of their children. Those who said "no matter what age" are incorrect. After all, should parents be kept in the dark about their 5 year-old child's medical conditions? I think not.
But to get an answer regarding your situation, find out what your local laws state.
Also, in some areas, you can purchase home drug test kits over the counter. No doctors need to get involved in that case.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?"worldwide"? lol
Every country has different standards as far as what information can be released to parents on their children. Heck, here in the US the standards vary from state to state.
That said, your parents cannot make you have a drug test especially if it is not medically necessary. I think they are just trying to scare you.
So, are you doing drugs?
Okay if you was even 12 and you did weed and you demanded the doctor tell nobody including parents he would keep it confidential so you got nothing to worry about.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?No, doctors must have a connection between their patients, under no circumstances can doctors tell any one else what a patient has told them in confidence.
You could take legal action if the doctor betrayed your trust
hope this helpsAre doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
No country gives minors control over their medical information. Your parents control until you're an adult.
Yes. It is perfectly legal, a 16 year old child is a minor. It would actually be illegal not to.Are doctors allowed to release information to parents without the child consent if the child is 16?
You will have to specify your country to get a real answer to this.
There is no "worldwide" answer...
Yes, I believe it is. The age of consent (Legal Age) is 18 in most countries. At 18 you are on your own.
Absolutely not, you are the patient and the doctor has to respect your privacy no matter what your age.
Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
AARP lost MANY members by backing Obama care %26amp; there is that lil thing about getting ready for death and all...Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?Rather sad and pathetic to see a sitting President attempt to politicize education for his own personal gain . Its an indicator that Obama is breaking and grasping at straws its the moral equivalent of a grown man taking a teenager to the big dance.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
Nothing worse than preparing for the end of life. Just ask any estate planning attorney.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?the kids are the only ones gullible enough to believe this nonsense anymore - even the liberals have wised up and turned on him.
LOL! I guess he'll take it wherever he can get it!
edit - Justine...great answer!Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?Believe it or not, Obama can actually do more than one thing at a time.
Education is one of his big priorities. He knows how important his mother's commitment to his education has been to his life, and he hopes to inspire others to stay in school, study, and learn.
As for end of life counseling, if the AARP members understood what's actually in the bills rather than what FOX has told them is in there they would have supported it wholeheartedly. I have yet to talk to anyone who wants to be kept alive on life support for weeks or years after they would have died naturally just because they didn't have clear instructions for their doctors and family members.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
How many members did they lose and what percentage of their subscribers is it?
As one pundit said on tv last hour, he is forced to go preach to the kids who really WERE born yesterday and might believe him.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
Truthfully the President is attempting to reach out to our youth because among industrialized nations our kids are the poorest performing and apparently the most undereducated. An American child going up against a Belgian, German, Indian, Japanese, or Chinese kid is like bringing a feather to a gunfight. You're kid will make them laugh as they mow him down.
Obama knows that targeting youth is part of his overall organizing strategy and he's taking another time slot to get it done.
Wow, you really are blond aren't you? You're out of date sweetheart, those death panel rumors were debunked weeks ago. The only people who still believe them also believe in gnomes and fairies.
Barry O has been unable to get adults to believe what he is selling so he is looking for an group he can influence so he is going after "future" voters. What he does not understand is parents see through he ruse and are either opting their children out or the schools are pulling the plug and making it optional. Poor Poor Barry, lots of hot air and nothing to inflate---but his own ego.
the seniors aren't done yet. everything you have today is because of what someone did in the past
Yes, he's trying to get the children's vote! You're a political genius!
Kids can't vote, Brainiac. And very few adults get their political opinions from their kids.
Try again.
could be however I think he is recruiting for his civilian defense corps
He is going to send them all coloring books like Kim Jong ll would do in NKorea. Start the indoctrination.
I wouldn't doubt thats part of it, but I think this is another bonehead, "fly Air Force One by Ground Zero for a photo op" idea by some WH flunky %26amp; Barry signed on. Come on, Barry! Rreach out to kids, near 9-11, like Bush was with kids? Parallels are striking. BHO needs some new publicity advisors.
Ahhh..the kid thing is a cheap ploy to make more of Bush with kids in school on 911. As usual, barry has to glitz it up %26amp; do ALL schools. It gets his face in front of impressionable kids who can't tell when they're being used %26amp; is a great propaganda tool. Tho' this one may backfire if enough parents ekeep their kiods home. I hope so.
%26amp; on the health care front, it takes attention away.
Kids are the only ones that will sit enraptured %26amp; not make a big fuss.
He's got to start the brainwashing early if he expects them to willingly become Soylent Green when they're 35.
nikki has a good point,but she needs a motorcycle like yours,,,I agree with her on this one. That Air Force One over new york was pure crap....dn
Nothing worse than preparing for the end of life. Just ask any estate planning attorney.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?the kids are the only ones gullible enough to believe this nonsense anymore - even the liberals have wised up and turned on him.
LOL! I guess he'll take it wherever he can get it!
edit - Justine...great answer!Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?Believe it or not, Obama can actually do more than one thing at a time.
Education is one of his big priorities. He knows how important his mother's commitment to his education has been to his life, and he hopes to inspire others to stay in school, study, and learn.
As for end of life counseling, if the AARP members understood what's actually in the bills rather than what FOX has told them is in there they would have supported it wholeheartedly. I have yet to talk to anyone who wants to be kept alive on life support for weeks or years after they would have died naturally just because they didn't have clear instructions for their doctors and family members.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
How many members did they lose and what percentage of their subscribers is it?
As one pundit said on tv last hour, he is forced to go preach to the kids who really WERE born yesterday and might believe him.Is Obama attempting to reach out to children because his health care has forsaken seniors?
Truthfully the President is attempting to reach out to our youth because among industrialized nations our kids are the poorest performing and apparently the most undereducated. An American child going up against a Belgian, German, Indian, Japanese, or Chinese kid is like bringing a feather to a gunfight. You're kid will make them laugh as they mow him down.
Obama knows that targeting youth is part of his overall organizing strategy and he's taking another time slot to get it done.
Wow, you really are blond aren't you? You're out of date sweetheart, those death panel rumors were debunked weeks ago. The only people who still believe them also believe in gnomes and fairies.
Barry O has been unable to get adults to believe what he is selling so he is looking for an group he can influence so he is going after "future" voters. What he does not understand is parents see through he ruse and are either opting their children out or the schools are pulling the plug and making it optional. Poor Poor Barry, lots of hot air and nothing to inflate---but his own ego.
the seniors aren't done yet. everything you have today is because of what someone did in the past
Yes, he's trying to get the children's vote! You're a political genius!
Kids can't vote, Brainiac. And very few adults get their political opinions from their kids.
Try again.
could be however I think he is recruiting for his civilian defense corps
He is going to send them all coloring books like Kim Jong ll would do in NKorea. Start the indoctrination.
I wouldn't doubt thats part of it, but I think this is another bonehead, "fly Air Force One by Ground Zero for a photo op" idea by some WH flunky %26amp; Barry signed on. Come on, Barry! Rreach out to kids, near 9-11, like Bush was with kids? Parallels are striking. BHO needs some new publicity advisors.
Ahhh..the kid thing is a cheap ploy to make more of Bush with kids in school on 911. As usual, barry has to glitz it up %26amp; do ALL schools. It gets his face in front of impressionable kids who can't tell when they're being used %26amp; is a great propaganda tool. Tho' this one may backfire if enough parents ekeep their kiods home. I hope so.
%26amp; on the health care front, it takes attention away.
Kids are the only ones that will sit enraptured %26amp; not make a big fuss.
He's got to start the brainwashing early if he expects them to willingly become Soylent Green when they're 35.
nikki has a good point,but she needs a motorcycle like yours,,,I agree with her on this one. That Air Force One over new york was pure crap....dn
Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?
which one do you think is better for children and for all humans. teaching them stories from bible or religious books or about their mental and emotional health.Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?I'm really laughing right now because that is an interesting way of putting it! But yes, emotional and mental health definitely. Because they need those things before they can learn about or study anything else. Plus the stories of Hell and very damaging to a child's mental health.Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?
it is important to raise them as naturally as you can, teaching them what you can without forcing them. It is good to look at them like at humans and to talk with them sincerely.The bible is important not for itself, but for the Holy Spirit in and through whom it was written. The purpose of the human life is obtaining the Holy Spirit, but because we do not know how to do that , who the Holy Spirit is and how to recognize him, we should try at least to try to have his fruits: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness. And I would say, that something that gives him a chance to remember always not to waste his life and to rise if he will fall, which is mercy. But above all you must be natural, you must not say you believe things you do not really believe just to make him believe them. His profound human structures, given by god to all men, are those you must protect and hope he will keep when he will be a mature person. If you do not know something, try to be sincere.If you do not know what is good do not try to replace that through something that will limit his human capacities, freedom, goodness.Try to find the truth for you and always to have advices given from your hart, not because you do not know what to say. Be gentile with him, this is important, love him, even if you do not know theories.Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?many stories in the bible are about mental and emotional health...Jesus Christ was the greatest psychologist who ever lived...
edit: yep. serious as a heart attack...if you knew anything about him, versus what you have been told, you would see where i'm coming from...
Mental/emotional health for sure. If people spent as much time teaching their kids about mental/emotional health as they do indoctrinating them, I'm sure suicide and depression rates would drop dramatically.Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?Well, since the Bible is a fiction, fairy-tale. Why not include it with all the other fairytales you read your kids, like Cinderella and Little Red Riding hood?Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?
You can combine both because scripture is about right living, and that promotes emotional, mental and spiritual health.
We should be teaching children about the Bible and trusting in the Lord. This is very important and of course salvation that comes from Jesus Christ. =)Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?
The latter without a doubt. It is far more practical knowledge.
"Jesus Christ was the greatest psychologist who ever lived"
Are you being serious here?
Their mental and emotional health.
Teaching children bible is child abuse.
The Bible as it teaches how to be in control in all the relationships of man.
What good will the latter do in 150 years? Teaching the The Bible will help them for eternity.
I would never teach a child the nonsense fairy tales in the bible!
Why can't they learn both?
some of each
all of it.
it is important to raise them as naturally as you can, teaching them what you can without forcing them. It is good to look at them like at humans and to talk with them sincerely.The bible is important not for itself, but for the Holy Spirit in and through whom it was written. The purpose of the human life is obtaining the Holy Spirit, but because we do not know how to do that , who the Holy Spirit is and how to recognize him, we should try at least to try to have his fruits: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness. And I would say, that something that gives him a chance to remember always not to waste his life and to rise if he will fall, which is mercy. But above all you must be natural, you must not say you believe things you do not really believe just to make him believe them. His profound human structures, given by god to all men, are those you must protect and hope he will keep when he will be a mature person. If you do not know something, try to be sincere.If you do not know what is good do not try to replace that through something that will limit his human capacities, freedom, goodness.Try to find the truth for you and always to have advices given from your hart, not because you do not know what to say. Be gentile with him, this is important, love him, even if you do not know theories.Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?many stories in the bible are about mental and emotional health...Jesus Christ was the greatest psychologist who ever lived...
edit: yep. serious as a heart attack...if you knew anything about him, versus what you have been told, you would see where i'm coming from...
Mental/emotional health for sure. If people spent as much time teaching their kids about mental/emotional health as they do indoctrinating them, I'm sure suicide and depression rates would drop dramatically.Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?Well, since the Bible is a fiction, fairy-tale. Why not include it with all the other fairytales you read your kids, like Cinderella and Little Red Riding hood?Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?
You can combine both because scripture is about right living, and that promotes emotional, mental and spiritual health.
We should be teaching children about the Bible and trusting in the Lord. This is very important and of course salvation that comes from Jesus Christ. =)Is it better to teach children about Bible or emotional and mental health of humans?
The latter without a doubt. It is far more practical knowledge.
"Jesus Christ was the greatest psychologist who ever lived"
Are you being serious here?
Their mental and emotional health.
Teaching children bible is child abuse.
The Bible as it teaches how to be in control in all the relationships of man.
What good will the latter do in 150 years? Teaching the The Bible will help them for eternity.
I would never teach a child the nonsense fairy tales in the bible!
Why can't they learn both?
some of each
all of it.
Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
My husband is looking to start an apprenticeship in a tattoo parlor. Hes an artist but he wants to take his art to another level. What my concern is that we have 4 small children in the house and Im scared that since hes going to be in contact with skin and some blood he might catch some air bone illness or harm full bacteria that may get the children or even me sick! What are the odds...He says Im being to paranoid. I just want my children to be safe.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?I'm a tattoo artist/piercer and trust me, health and cleanliness is the biggest priority in reputable tattoo shops. First of all, your husband isn't even going to be tattooing for a while if he's just starting an apprenticeship. He's going to be doing things like talking to customers, cleaning the shop, setting up equipment, etc.
Second of all, when/if he does start tattooing, cleanliness is a huge issue. The area of the body that the client is getting tattooed is cleaned thoroughly. The tattoo artist wears gloves and in some shops, a mask. Tattoo artists wash their hands before and after every client. And all needles and equipment are sterilized, and disposed after each client.
Trust me, you have nothing to worry about. Good tattoo shops pride themselves on things like this.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
There isn't a chance of passing an air borrn illness in a tattoo shop accept for maybe the common cold. You should be more worried about him possibly getting a skin infection. But the chances of your children or you getting sick from that are next to nothing. Tattoo shops have changed over the years, most of them have become cleaner and have to follow the rules of the local health department when it comes to disposing equipment and cleaning. If any thing he should look into getting vaccinated for Hepatitis and I'm sure he isn't going to be careless enough to bring any thing home with him that could make you or your children sick.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?In his apprenticeship, one of the most broad and important topics taught will be cleanliness and safety - both for the piercer %26amp; "piercee." Piercing has come such a long way in terms of health and sterilization, so I don't think you have anything to worry about. So long as he keeps gloves on and clean hands underneath, that's essentially the only part of him that will come in contact with anyone else.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
Wow, try some communication so you can become better informed. Knowledge is powerShould i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?I feel sorry for him... Your reason is the same excuse the government has been using to take away our freedoms. God help him if he decides to get into firearms. Stick with what you know, your soccer practice van and CNNShould i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
You're paranoid. Although tattoo shops look dirty, you'd be surprised at how clean they are. I can't remember what magazine it was, but I read most are cleaner than fast food kitchens.
Second of all, when/if he does start tattooing, cleanliness is a huge issue. The area of the body that the client is getting tattooed is cleaned thoroughly. The tattoo artist wears gloves and in some shops, a mask. Tattoo artists wash their hands before and after every client. And all needles and equipment are sterilized, and disposed after each client.
Trust me, you have nothing to worry about. Good tattoo shops pride themselves on things like this.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
There isn't a chance of passing an air borrn illness in a tattoo shop accept for maybe the common cold. You should be more worried about him possibly getting a skin infection. But the chances of your children or you getting sick from that are next to nothing. Tattoo shops have changed over the years, most of them have become cleaner and have to follow the rules of the local health department when it comes to disposing equipment and cleaning. If any thing he should look into getting vaccinated for Hepatitis and I'm sure he isn't going to be careless enough to bring any thing home with him that could make you or your children sick.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?In his apprenticeship, one of the most broad and important topics taught will be cleanliness and safety - both for the piercer %26amp; "piercee." Piercing has come such a long way in terms of health and sterilization, so I don't think you have anything to worry about. So long as he keeps gloves on and clean hands underneath, that's essentially the only part of him that will come in contact with anyone else.Should i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
Wow, try some communication so you can become better informed. Knowledge is powerShould i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?I feel sorry for him... Your reason is the same excuse the government has been using to take away our freedoms. God help him if he decides to get into firearms. Stick with what you know, your soccer practice van and CNNShould i be concerned about my and my children's health if my husband becomes a tattoo artist?
You're paranoid. Although tattoo shops look dirty, you'd be surprised at how clean they are. I can't remember what magazine it was, but I read most are cleaner than fast food kitchens.
Are there any health insurance plans based on income?
I'm a student and work part-time. I need health insurance before I go back to school in a few weeks but I only make 700/month. I don't qualify for state health care since I have a child and live with her father who earns too much.Are there any health insurance plans based on income?I don't know of any health insurance plans based on income, but there are certainly some plans specifically for students that take this into account. Try contacting your college or university healthcare department, they can probably put you in touch with companies that offer student healthcare plans.suzuki samurai
Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children? Many children below the poverty line don't have health care. If universal health-care provides health-care to kids in the inner city and poor neighborhoods and areas why do they want to take that away from america's most at risk children? are they looking out for the blue collar american family they claim to represent or for themselves and those already with health-care?Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?Greetings! That is an excellent question. If they sat in Emergency Rooms like several of my clients have to when they need medical care, they probably would be singing a different tune. Every other industrialized nation have figured ways to take care of their citizens...everyone except us. Now that we have it on the board for real, only the Republicans have the audacity to remove it. It's very sad, and also very telling.
They argue that it is the Democrats that need to take notice of the tea party. Well, now that Republicans have the floor, they now have two years to completely correct the devastation that their previous leader, George W. Bush created, the EXACT amount of time that they have given President Obama. Lets see if they can deliver.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
Dear heart, Republicans are not against health-care for poor children per se! They first and foremost, have no interest in the poor at any age! Can't you see that! Why do they vote against policies that would benefit the poor and the elderly? It's because they are against any policy sut forth by our awesome president! Unfortunately, the greatest benefit to all americans that failed inclusion into the health bill was public policy, which would have allowed competition amongst major insurers whose cost have run amuk. We would have quicky seen the healthcare cost drop in half by these insures whose customers would have run for the less expensive option. We unfortunately, no longer have that option and for that, I am truly saddened.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?The answer is Medicaid - medical care for those unable to pay for it due to financial shortfall. Please name the Republican that wants to take that away from these unfortunate kids. If the income cut-off is too high then the law should be amended. Blaming unnamed Republicans for something that hasn't been shown to be fact is not the best way to start, or continue, discourse on the national health care problem.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
Why are people who can not afford health care for their children having children to begin with? Why can't they take a little personal responsibility and say, we can't afford children so we shouldn't have them. Why do liberals like to pick the pocket of the tax payor and give to those who think they are owed a living by everybody else?
I assure you there are enough state programs available for poor families, in Florida we had a program that if you made less than 30K your children could be insured for $15 a month. Most conservatives oppose national healthcare because of the beauracracy that will have to be funded in order to administer it. Remember there is nothing Government can do outside of it constituional limits as well or a economically as private industry can!Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?"Poor children" have health care provided by the taxpayers, have had so for a long time. Drama is unbecoming.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
What do you call Medicaid and or CHiPs? Try again genius. If you or any inner city kids were poor and did not have health coverage then blame mommy and daddy because the programs are there.
Nice false choice there, sport. Why do leftists believe in fantasyland?
They argue that it is the Democrats that need to take notice of the tea party. Well, now that Republicans have the floor, they now have two years to completely correct the devastation that their previous leader, George W. Bush created, the EXACT amount of time that they have given President Obama. Lets see if they can deliver.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
Dear heart, Republicans are not against health-care for poor children per se! They first and foremost, have no interest in the poor at any age! Can't you see that! Why do they vote against policies that would benefit the poor and the elderly? It's because they are against any policy sut forth by our awesome president! Unfortunately, the greatest benefit to all americans that failed inclusion into the health bill was public policy, which would have allowed competition amongst major insurers whose cost have run amuk. We would have quicky seen the healthcare cost drop in half by these insures whose customers would have run for the less expensive option. We unfortunately, no longer have that option and for that, I am truly saddened.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?The answer is Medicaid - medical care for those unable to pay for it due to financial shortfall. Please name the Republican that wants to take that away from these unfortunate kids. If the income cut-off is too high then the law should be amended. Blaming unnamed Republicans for something that hasn't been shown to be fact is not the best way to start, or continue, discourse on the national health care problem.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
Why are people who can not afford health care for their children having children to begin with? Why can't they take a little personal responsibility and say, we can't afford children so we shouldn't have them. Why do liberals like to pick the pocket of the tax payor and give to those who think they are owed a living by everybody else?
I assure you there are enough state programs available for poor families, in Florida we had a program that if you made less than 30K your children could be insured for $15 a month. Most conservatives oppose national healthcare because of the beauracracy that will have to be funded in order to administer it. Remember there is nothing Government can do outside of it constituional limits as well or a economically as private industry can!Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?"Poor children" have health care provided by the taxpayers, have had so for a long time. Drama is unbecoming.Why are Republicans against Health-care for poor children?
What do you call Medicaid and or CHiPs? Try again genius. If you or any inner city kids were poor and did not have health coverage then blame mommy and daddy because the programs are there.
Nice false choice there, sport. Why do leftists believe in fantasyland?
Child's health.?
My two yrs old son regularly get ill.
Don't take his diet properly.
Not gaining weight.
PLS HELP.Child's health.?every child is different. the only one that can answer your question specifically about your child; is his dr. discuss this throroughtly with him/her.Child's health.?
grind some garlic,beetle leaves,ginger,asafotidea,tulsi,and one more is they say it as om leaves i don't have the correct name it comes in the form of grain also and leaves if you ask in a shop where they sale javatri they would give you that om it would be a little hot and give the essence of the grinded paste he would go motions and he would take his diet properly and he would gain weight and he would eat well avoid biscuits for him and junk food which causes ill health if he ate one full biscuit he must at least drink 2 glasses of water for the flour to dissolve so make sure of itChild's health.?do you have health insurence and a pediatrician??? what is his diet????? some children as they get a little older will not gain as much because they are starting to run and play more. my daughter actually lost weight. her doc said is ok, she eats and is healthy, just active!!!.......... please clarify and i can better answer....Child's health.?
More fruits and veggies! Especially avocados - they are high in fat (the good kind) and nutrient content as well.Child's health.?Try giving him Flintstones vitamins plus immunity support. I started giving to my daughters after they started head start last year. They were getting sick every other week until I started giving them the vitamins. After they were hardly ever sick.Child's health.?
Do you have him on any type of vitamin suppliments?
That will help with the poor diet. As far as not gaining weight my son is rather small as well (5% percentile according to his dr.) but he's also pretty tall (over the top of chart) so it pretty much evens him out.
Maybe he's hitting a growth spurt and that's why his eating habits are poor and he's not gaining weight.
Have u made an appt. with the dr.?
I would start there and voice your concerns to them
Don't take his diet properly.
Not gaining weight.
PLS HELP.Child's health.?every child is different. the only one that can answer your question specifically about your child; is his dr. discuss this throroughtly with him/her.Child's health.?
grind some garlic,beetle leaves,ginger,asafotidea,tulsi,and one more is they say it as om leaves i don't have the correct name it comes in the form of grain also and leaves if you ask in a shop where they sale javatri they would give you that om it would be a little hot and give the essence of the grinded paste he would go motions and he would take his diet properly and he would gain weight and he would eat well avoid biscuits for him and junk food which causes ill health if he ate one full biscuit he must at least drink 2 glasses of water for the flour to dissolve so make sure of itChild's health.?do you have health insurence and a pediatrician??? what is his diet????? some children as they get a little older will not gain as much because they are starting to run and play more. my daughter actually lost weight. her doc said is ok, she eats and is healthy, just active!!!.......... please clarify and i can better answer....Child's health.?
More fruits and veggies! Especially avocados - they are high in fat (the good kind) and nutrient content as well.Child's health.?Try giving him Flintstones vitamins plus immunity support. I started giving to my daughters after they started head start last year. They were getting sick every other week until I started giving them the vitamins. After they were hardly ever sick.Child's health.?
Do you have him on any type of vitamin suppliments?
That will help with the poor diet. As far as not gaining weight my son is rather small as well (5% percentile according to his dr.) but he's also pretty tall (over the top of chart) so it pretty much evens him out.
Maybe he's hitting a growth spurt and that's why his eating habits are poor and he's not gaining weight.
Have u made an appt. with the dr.?
I would start there and voice your concerns to them
When is the earliest a child can be insured?
Is there a minimum age for the health and/or life insurance of a child? If yes, what is it?When is the earliest a child can be insured?They can have either life or health insurance on the day they are born. Many infants are covered by health and life insurance.
Good question.When is the earliest a child can be insured?Right away. I bought my kid's life insurance in infancy, and added to my health insurance immediately. If you don't have health insurance yourself, most states have some kind of kid's health insurance available. Call an agent for specific details. Are congratulations in order? If you have a newborn, congrats.When is the earliest a child can be insured?There is no minimum age for health or life insurance for a child. The only limitation is that life insurance on a child can usually only be written for a fairly low maximum, I believe it may be up to $10,000. Life insurance on a child is usually used to help cover burial expenses since children typically do not have income replacement issues.When is the earliest a child can be insured?
You should think twice about getting life insurance for a child. If you were to lose a child it would be a tragic loss, but life insurance is designed to replace income for surviving family members. It's probably safe to assume your child is not earning income you are depending on so you probably don't need life insurance for him/her.
Health insurance is very important for young children and they are usually added to your policy right away. I think it can even be retroactive up to a certain time (30 days).
Good question.When is the earliest a child can be insured?Right away. I bought my kid's life insurance in infancy, and added to my health insurance immediately. If you don't have health insurance yourself, most states have some kind of kid's health insurance available. Call an agent for specific details. Are congratulations in order? If you have a newborn, congrats.When is the earliest a child can be insured?There is no minimum age for health or life insurance for a child. The only limitation is that life insurance on a child can usually only be written for a fairly low maximum, I believe it may be up to $10,000. Life insurance on a child is usually used to help cover burial expenses since children typically do not have income replacement issues.When is the earliest a child can be insured?
You should think twice about getting life insurance for a child. If you were to lose a child it would be a tragic loss, but life insurance is designed to replace income for surviving family members. It's probably safe to assume your child is not earning income you are depending on so you probably don't need life insurance for him/her.
Health insurance is very important for young children and they are usually added to your policy right away. I think it can even be retroactive up to a certain time (30 days).
Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?
..im 19 years old virgin and for past year i've been experiencing chronic pains "downstairs", i heard once that some girl who was 20 and virgin, was also experiencing abnormal pains, especially while she was on period and her doctor told her that only solution to it would be her having sex and having a child..... what are possible health - side affects of being virgin?Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?Talk to your doctor about the pain but no it's not because you're a virgin.Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?
just use a dildo if you dont want to loose it with a man at this moment...Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?being a virgin is actually extremely healthy for women because their vagina hasn't been changed and confused to the brain. this is a definite myth that being a virgin is bad. society today makes it that you HAVE to have sex. i honestly think just waiting till your married because then that honeymoon night will be an AMAZING night. your pains is probably just something common. having a child is really bad for the femal reproductive system because it changes the cycle and everything.
no i'm a 13 year old male virgin but anyway u will not have any side effects if u are a virginCan staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?Well, that sounds like some BS to me.
You will be fine - I promise that you don't have to go get knocked up just to solve your problem.
Call your doctor and tell him about your worries - he may need to check for an infection or cyst or something.
But don't go out having sex just because you think it will solve your problem.Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?
no being a virgin has no side affects at all! back in the day women stayed Virgins until they were married and sometimes that wasn't until like 25 so your fine. (btw i'm 14 not 50 and i just heard my grandma go on and on about the whole sex to young thing, not that i have had any.) maybe you have an infection. WOW there is a reasonable solution.
Your doctor is a fool and a quack! Never go back there. Having sex or children will not provide a solution!
The 'side effects' of being a virgin are freedom from disease, more respect and honour in marriage and freedom from guilt.
Provided the 'flow' is normal and there is no 'blockage', spasmodic pains can be experienced by numerous women, younger or older, as a matter of course and the 'pains' often clear up spontaneously.
For relief in the meantime, however, take 3 x 1000mg of 'Evening Primrose' capsules for a day or two prior to your next period and, drink a couple of cups of Chamomile tea during the first day/s of the period. If you are over- or under-weight, even slightly, some light exercises to regain general fitness also helps.Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?
Nothing.
You're probably just ovulating or you need to poop or pee.
I get abnormal feelings in my abdomen and "down there" all the time.
What you heard isn't true, but it is true that women who never get pregnant or never go on the pill are thought to have a higher risk of ovarian cancer because of constantly ovulating. So in a way, there is a side effect to being a virgin.
aye, indeed. in some rare cases women have died from not having sex
just use a dildo if you dont want to loose it with a man at this moment...Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?being a virgin is actually extremely healthy for women because their vagina hasn't been changed and confused to the brain. this is a definite myth that being a virgin is bad. society today makes it that you HAVE to have sex. i honestly think just waiting till your married because then that honeymoon night will be an AMAZING night. your pains is probably just something common. having a child is really bad for the femal reproductive system because it changes the cycle and everything.
no i'm a 13 year old male virgin but anyway u will not have any side effects if u are a virginCan staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?Well, that sounds like some BS to me.
You will be fine - I promise that you don't have to go get knocked up just to solve your problem.
Call your doctor and tell him about your worries - he may need to check for an infection or cyst or something.
But don't go out having sex just because you think it will solve your problem.Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?
no being a virgin has no side affects at all! back in the day women stayed Virgins until they were married and sometimes that wasn't until like 25 so your fine. (btw i'm 14 not 50 and i just heard my grandma go on and on about the whole sex to young thing, not that i have had any.) maybe you have an infection. WOW there is a reasonable solution.
Your doctor is a fool and a quack! Never go back there. Having sex or children will not provide a solution!
The 'side effects' of being a virgin are freedom from disease, more respect and honour in marriage and freedom from guilt.
Provided the 'flow' is normal and there is no 'blockage', spasmodic pains can be experienced by numerous women, younger or older, as a matter of course and the 'pains' often clear up spontaneously.
For relief in the meantime, however, take 3 x 1000mg of 'Evening Primrose' capsules for a day or two prior to your next period and, drink a couple of cups of Chamomile tea during the first day/s of the period. If you are over- or under-weight, even slightly, some light exercises to regain general fitness also helps.Can staying a virgin for long time have health sideaffects for females?
Nothing.
You're probably just ovulating or you need to poop or pee.
I get abnormal feelings in my abdomen and "down there" all the time.
What you heard isn't true, but it is true that women who never get pregnant or never go on the pill are thought to have a higher risk of ovarian cancer because of constantly ovulating. So in a way, there is a side effect to being a virgin.
aye, indeed. in some rare cases women have died from not having sex
What is the health and social care needsfor child/parent with atopic ecezema?
in nursingWhat is the health and social care needsfor child/parent with atopic ecezema?my son has atopic ecezma, and he has it severe, he is 12 and has got many creams, ointments and medicines for his skin, he has it all year round without a break. obvisouly we have to buy him cotton clothes and wash his bedding on a regular basis. some foods can trigger it off too so extreme caution is needed. due to alot of bullying when he was in junior school he has no social life other than going to school. i have just enrolled him on a fitness course to help with his social life. he does require alot of help and i am up 2/3 times a night when he is red and sore, he often needs antibiotics. but he also suffers from asthma as well again this is controlled by using inhalers. hope this is the sort of info you were looking for.What is the health and social care needsfor child/parent with atopic ecezema?not sure what you are looking for but a great site i have found is .....tinyurl dot com forward slash ar8lmw, it should give you some great pointers for your needsmediterranean recipes
Under Obama's Health care plan will health care be better for politicians @ their families then regular people?
My concern is that Obama and his wife and children will get better health care service under universal health care then my husband and child soon to be born. I read where in canada you have to wait up to 9 hours to see a doctor. There was an undercover agent who made a film of this on u tube though I have not viewed the film. If my family must get substandard health care then Obama's family should also get the same. My family is more important to me then his family.Under Obama's Health care plan will health care be better for politicians @ their families then regular people?Look let's face it. Our health care sucks too. I have good insurance, fully covered. My son broke his leg on a Fri night. They put a brace on it, gave him meds and sent him home. They said...call the ortho doctor on monday so he can do surgery. Is this elective? No! he needs pins put in. we had to wait 5 days for help. Yes. Did we call 3 different ortho doctors who are "too busy" to see him? Yes.
Is this "better" care than everyone says is available in England or Canada?
Both my husband and I have always worked. We pay our bills, and we pay monthly for health insurance, but we pay $200 for emergency room visit, automatic. We will pay 10-20% of the surgery bill depending on which doctor does it.
The hospital bill for our other son's appendectomy was $45,000. Our share $4500. That's with insurance!.....
We need change, but I do not hold out hope for it from the democrats or the republicans. It will take every citizen canceling their policies and refusing to pay premiums to do any good......
The rich and powerful always have better options..that is true in the US and its true in CHina...Under Obama's Health care plan will health care be better for politicians @ their families then regular people?This plan is not the same as Canada's plan. You will have a choice for a private insurance company, and if you can't afford it, you could get the one run by the government.
The people who work in the government have an insurance plan thru a private provider.
Ted Kennedy said that he wants Americans to have the same plan that they have in Congress.Under Obama's Health care plan will health care be better for politicians @ their families then regular people?I doubt that they will even use the government run program.
Is this "better" care than everyone says is available in England or Canada?
Both my husband and I have always worked. We pay our bills, and we pay monthly for health insurance, but we pay $200 for emergency room visit, automatic. We will pay 10-20% of the surgery bill depending on which doctor does it.
The hospital bill for our other son's appendectomy was $45,000. Our share $4500. That's with insurance!.....
We need change, but I do not hold out hope for it from the democrats or the republicans. It will take every citizen canceling their policies and refusing to pay premiums to do any good......
The rich and powerful always have better options..that is true in the US and its true in CHina...Under Obama's Health care plan will health care be better for politicians @ their families then regular people?This plan is not the same as Canada's plan. You will have a choice for a private insurance company, and if you can't afford it, you could get the one run by the government.
The people who work in the government have an insurance plan thru a private provider.
Ted Kennedy said that he wants Americans to have the same plan that they have in Congress.Under Obama's Health care plan will health care be better for politicians @ their families then regular people?I doubt that they will even use the government run program.
Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?
Suppose you have a child or spouse who has a horrible health condition and are currently employed. You lose your job, and thereby lose coverage, not only for yourself but for your family member. Is your child/spouse left to die, or are there programs that can help pay for this, considering that the cost of such a medical expense is too great for a person with to job without health insurance to cover?
For this case, just consider the U.S.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?Not in the US.
That's why health care reform is such a big topic now.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?
medicaidIs there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?health-quotes.isgreat.org - here is my health insurance plan. As I remember they can provide such a service.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?
When you lose your job, you can get COBRA coverage afterwards.
Most states have a high risk health insurance pool - but many of them have wait periods.
And for children, the truly poor, and disabled people, we have government health care - Medicaid and medicare. 25% of Americans are actually on government health care right now.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?Many States have High Risk Insurance pools.
Put the state you are in in front of " high risk health insurance pool" and Do a yaho search, and follow the link.
American Seniors
www.americanseniors.com
For this case, just consider the U.S.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?Not in the US.
That's why health care reform is such a big topic now.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?
medicaidIs there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?health-quotes.isgreat.org - here is my health insurance plan. As I remember they can provide such a service.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?
When you lose your job, you can get COBRA coverage afterwards.
Most states have a high risk health insurance pool - but many of them have wait periods.
And for children, the truly poor, and disabled people, we have government health care - Medicaid and medicare. 25% of Americans are actually on government health care right now.Is there health insurance coverage for unemployed people with adverse medical conditions?Many States have High Risk Insurance pools.
Put the state you are in in front of " high risk health insurance pool" and Do a yaho search, and follow the link.
American Seniors
www.americanseniors.com
What is the average salary of a Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse?
What would the average salary be for either a Child/Adolescent OR an Adult Psychiatric/Mental Health Clinical Nurse Specialist WITH a Master's Degree in Nursing?
THANK YOU!What is the average salary of a Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse?http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=鈥?/a>
THANK YOU!What is the average salary of a Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse?http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=鈥?/a>
Are there many children dying without health care in your area?
Not near me. I can't think of one; why I even know a homeless man who just had his teeth worked on.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?you are a mean spirited Republican...and Rush is too fat..Glenn Beck is a drunk and Pastor Ted....Are there many children dying without health care in your area?
Not really and it doesn't in fact happen very often. In a population of over 300 million it's suprisingly rare that you hear of a child dying because he didn't receive health treatment.
With saying that, many children do suffer unneccessarily because the parent let's a sickness run its course (due to lack of health insurance) instead of seeing a Doctor to ease the child's pain / symptoms. Likewise there are illnesses that aren't initially "emergencies" but because parents wait to seek help they do become emergencies. Even though they get treatment the scars / lingering affects often last thru their adult life.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?How about you look at what the WHO has published concerning infancy deaths in the US compared to those nations with Universal Health Care.
Because you can't see any in your neighborhood doesn't mean it doesn't happen in America, it does.
If it isn't raining in your area does it mean it doesn't rain in the US?
Come on now.
No. In our state and most states in the U.S,, all children are given health care insurance even if their family can't afford it. I looked into this program for a family member and it is a very good program. It includes full heath insurance plus food subsidies if needed.
I was working in Texas and they were having adds on TV begging people to sign up their children, because they were having trouble getting everyone to take advantage of this program.I am not sure why. Seems like everyone would care about their children.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?no...a not-for profit hospital cannot turn people away who need care and cannot forcefully collect payment for services. it would invalidate their irs status. FACT. if you have no health insurance and need care and walk into an emergency room and find you need to be admitted to have your problem taken care of, you will get the care you need.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?
Over the past ten years I have lived in a variety of environments ranging from basically the ghettos to upper middle class areas to military housing and have not heard of a single child dying from inability to get health care.
I have though read about and actually seen children being used for the care givers benefit (aka money).
Do they have to DIE to get your attention, or empathy? As for the homeless man, I seriously doubt "you know" any homeless people--not with your disgusting elitist attitude.
Recently on a Monday morning, as I sat in my dentist's chair for routine care, with my bourgeois health care, I heard an uninsured young cajun man come in and ask, in a humble, embarrassed quiet voice, if he could be seen--my dentist once had a reputation for "working people in"...the receptionist rather cold-heartedly told him the Dr. no longer saw non-patients.
The heartlessness of health care in this country, from top to bottom, makes me sick. So why don't you go peddle your heartless klaptrap elsewhere, Repug? It literally makes me want to vomit...if I'd thought of it in time, I'd have gladly given up my seat to the young man, given him a hundred bucks or so, and come back another day.
He'd obviously suffered all weekend. Dying as a child is easy compared to suffering with a toothache all weekend...
EDIT: AceKings, I adore %26amp; collect dialects, and live in a region where there's a distinct difference; besides, I may have caught a glimpse of him as I peered around the door, it's a small office...do we have a learning disability here?
Also, a "bleeding heart liberal" didn't give up her chair in time in a dentist's office...could it be that a stingy, greedy, "me first, me, mine, screw you" thinking nation (oh, no, Not *YOU*, ACEKING), might wait too late to fix a broken system that needs fixing before it takes us all under? That's an "analogy" for those of you (oh, no, Not *YOU*, ACEKING), who'd rather pop off about stereotypes than THINK too deeply about this...Are there many children dying without health care in your area?
So are you saying health care in America is in great shape? Everyone gets all the health care they need? That costs are handled efficiently, and that costs do not increase at greater than the rate of inflation?
All based on a single data point--what you know about your own area?
Brilliant research skills there, fella.
According to Democrats' numbers, no.
Take the "47 million uninsured"
Subtract out illegal aliens, people earning over $50,000, people already ELIGIBLE for subsidized care and people who are "uninsured" for less than a few months while they change plans and there is literally NO ONE left.
Seriously - NO ONE.
None. As a matter of fact, I spent Monday last week in the Emergency Room with my Mother-in-law after she ripped a bone deep gash in her leg from the ankle to the knee.
We waited over an hour and a half while the children of, obviously illegal aliens, were treated for the sniffles ahead of her.
Everybody who needs care gets it now. The emergency rooms are full of them, welfare pays a bloody fortune for the career welfare moochers. Nobody is dying in the streets, contrary what the socialists would have others believe.
Thank you for asking...yes there are but the local news media doesn't report on black infant deaths...its just not that important to them as it doesn't generate the number of viewers as say, the local state fair is coming up, get your cream puffs now! See...nice and fuzzy.
To Libby,
How did you know he was black if you only heard him? that's kinda racist. you should check your self in for some mental rehabilitation. your bourgeois insurance will now pay for it, due to our chairman.
oh yea, and you didnt give up your chair though, did you?
YES MY DAUGHTER JUST DIED 3 WEEKS AGO BECAUSE HER INSURANCE SAID THAT SHE HAD A PER-EXSISTING ILLNESS EVEN THOW SHE HAS BEEN PAYING FOR INSURANCE FOR 4 YEARS, AND THEY REFUSED TO PAY THE DOCTORS WICH MEANT THAT NO DOCTOR WOULD GIVE HER CARE WHICH RESULTED IN MY DAUGHTER DIEING, SO ALL YOU PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT'S TALKING ALL THAT TRASH I HOPE THAT THE SAME SITUATION THAT CAME TO MY FAMILY WOULD COME TO YOURS AND THAN YOU WILL SEE WHAT EVERONE IS TALKING ABOUT.
They're dropping like flies! We have to dig mass graves to bury them all before the vultures get to them. And not only that, but the starving, sickly children line all the streets, on the verge of collapse. It's pitiful!
I wouldn't know, I'm totally middle-class and I can easily afford health insurance. Perhaps if I lived in a less wealthy neighborhood I would find some. But no, I think I'll stick to my own close-minded view of the world...
The teeth of homeless people in the United States are in better condition than the teeth of people in England with its socialist healthcare.
RaGS sez : Yup! And there are homeless men as well as toothless men here, too. And there are also homeless, toothless men here, as well. But are we going to get our healthcare soon? I hope so, because my arthritis is really acting up.
No...They're all being taken care of. My question is...why do all these parents that have kids they can't afford, have money for tattoos, booze, cigarettes, dope, etc..?
There are some illegals that may suffer, but not an american that I know of. This whole healthcare bill is a crock and should be burned where it lays.
They are not dying or going to bed hungry. Thats just some liberal crap.
None, we have TENNCARE where I live and lots of poor people have that to fall back on.
Thank you for an honest perspective.
Nope- truly poor people have medicaid
No.
None that I am aware of.
Nope!
no,only ones being killed before they have a chance to even be born
You must live in a good area. Yeah. We've had more than a few die of inadequate healthcare, and I live in a small town.
Is it possible you just don't know? I'd imagine no one would have the time to read every obituary.
Not really and it doesn't in fact happen very often. In a population of over 300 million it's suprisingly rare that you hear of a child dying because he didn't receive health treatment.
With saying that, many children do suffer unneccessarily because the parent let's a sickness run its course (due to lack of health insurance) instead of seeing a Doctor to ease the child's pain / symptoms. Likewise there are illnesses that aren't initially "emergencies" but because parents wait to seek help they do become emergencies. Even though they get treatment the scars / lingering affects often last thru their adult life.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?How about you look at what the WHO has published concerning infancy deaths in the US compared to those nations with Universal Health Care.
Because you can't see any in your neighborhood doesn't mean it doesn't happen in America, it does.
If it isn't raining in your area does it mean it doesn't rain in the US?
Come on now.
No. In our state and most states in the U.S,, all children are given health care insurance even if their family can't afford it. I looked into this program for a family member and it is a very good program. It includes full heath insurance plus food subsidies if needed.
I was working in Texas and they were having adds on TV begging people to sign up their children, because they were having trouble getting everyone to take advantage of this program.I am not sure why. Seems like everyone would care about their children.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?no...a not-for profit hospital cannot turn people away who need care and cannot forcefully collect payment for services. it would invalidate their irs status. FACT. if you have no health insurance and need care and walk into an emergency room and find you need to be admitted to have your problem taken care of, you will get the care you need.Are there many children dying without health care in your area?
Over the past ten years I have lived in a variety of environments ranging from basically the ghettos to upper middle class areas to military housing and have not heard of a single child dying from inability to get health care.
I have though read about and actually seen children being used for the care givers benefit (aka money).
Do they have to DIE to get your attention, or empathy? As for the homeless man, I seriously doubt "you know" any homeless people--not with your disgusting elitist attitude.
Recently on a Monday morning, as I sat in my dentist's chair for routine care, with my bourgeois health care, I heard an uninsured young cajun man come in and ask, in a humble, embarrassed quiet voice, if he could be seen--my dentist once had a reputation for "working people in"...the receptionist rather cold-heartedly told him the Dr. no longer saw non-patients.
The heartlessness of health care in this country, from top to bottom, makes me sick. So why don't you go peddle your heartless klaptrap elsewhere, Repug? It literally makes me want to vomit...if I'd thought of it in time, I'd have gladly given up my seat to the young man, given him a hundred bucks or so, and come back another day.
He'd obviously suffered all weekend. Dying as a child is easy compared to suffering with a toothache all weekend...
EDIT: AceKings, I adore %26amp; collect dialects, and live in a region where there's a distinct difference; besides, I may have caught a glimpse of him as I peered around the door, it's a small office...do we have a learning disability here?
Also, a "bleeding heart liberal" didn't give up her chair in time in a dentist's office...could it be that a stingy, greedy, "me first, me, mine, screw you" thinking nation (oh, no, Not *YOU*, ACEKING), might wait too late to fix a broken system that needs fixing before it takes us all under? That's an "analogy" for those of you (oh, no, Not *YOU*, ACEKING), who'd rather pop off about stereotypes than THINK too deeply about this...Are there many children dying without health care in your area?
So are you saying health care in America is in great shape? Everyone gets all the health care they need? That costs are handled efficiently, and that costs do not increase at greater than the rate of inflation?
All based on a single data point--what you know about your own area?
Brilliant research skills there, fella.
According to Democrats' numbers, no.
Take the "47 million uninsured"
Subtract out illegal aliens, people earning over $50,000, people already ELIGIBLE for subsidized care and people who are "uninsured" for less than a few months while they change plans and there is literally NO ONE left.
Seriously - NO ONE.
None. As a matter of fact, I spent Monday last week in the Emergency Room with my Mother-in-law after she ripped a bone deep gash in her leg from the ankle to the knee.
We waited over an hour and a half while the children of, obviously illegal aliens, were treated for the sniffles ahead of her.
Everybody who needs care gets it now. The emergency rooms are full of them, welfare pays a bloody fortune for the career welfare moochers. Nobody is dying in the streets, contrary what the socialists would have others believe.
Thank you for asking...yes there are but the local news media doesn't report on black infant deaths...its just not that important to them as it doesn't generate the number of viewers as say, the local state fair is coming up, get your cream puffs now! See...nice and fuzzy.
To Libby,
How did you know he was black if you only heard him? that's kinda racist. you should check your self in for some mental rehabilitation. your bourgeois insurance will now pay for it, due to our chairman.
oh yea, and you didnt give up your chair though, did you?
YES MY DAUGHTER JUST DIED 3 WEEKS AGO BECAUSE HER INSURANCE SAID THAT SHE HAD A PER-EXSISTING ILLNESS EVEN THOW SHE HAS BEEN PAYING FOR INSURANCE FOR 4 YEARS, AND THEY REFUSED TO PAY THE DOCTORS WICH MEANT THAT NO DOCTOR WOULD GIVE HER CARE WHICH RESULTED IN MY DAUGHTER DIEING, SO ALL YOU PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT'S TALKING ALL THAT TRASH I HOPE THAT THE SAME SITUATION THAT CAME TO MY FAMILY WOULD COME TO YOURS AND THAN YOU WILL SEE WHAT EVERONE IS TALKING ABOUT.
They're dropping like flies! We have to dig mass graves to bury them all before the vultures get to them. And not only that, but the starving, sickly children line all the streets, on the verge of collapse. It's pitiful!
I wouldn't know, I'm totally middle-class and I can easily afford health insurance. Perhaps if I lived in a less wealthy neighborhood I would find some. But no, I think I'll stick to my own close-minded view of the world...
The teeth of homeless people in the United States are in better condition than the teeth of people in England with its socialist healthcare.
RaGS sez : Yup! And there are homeless men as well as toothless men here, too. And there are also homeless, toothless men here, as well. But are we going to get our healthcare soon? I hope so, because my arthritis is really acting up.
No...They're all being taken care of. My question is...why do all these parents that have kids they can't afford, have money for tattoos, booze, cigarettes, dope, etc..?
There are some illegals that may suffer, but not an american that I know of. This whole healthcare bill is a crock and should be burned where it lays.
They are not dying or going to bed hungry. Thats just some liberal crap.
None, we have TENNCARE where I live and lots of poor people have that to fall back on.
Thank you for an honest perspective.
Nope- truly poor people have medicaid
No.
None that I am aware of.
Nope!
no,only ones being killed before they have a chance to even be born
You must live in a good area. Yeah. We've had more than a few die of inadequate healthcare, and I live in a small town.
Is it possible you just don't know? I'd imagine no one would have the time to read every obituary.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)