Sunday, February 26, 2012
What is an intra-uterine environment and inter-uterine environment?
What is an intra-uterine environment and inter-uterine environment?What is an intra-uterine environment and inter-uterine environment?Intra-uterine is just the environment inside the uterus. Interuterine is the environment outside the uterus, but is generally used to talk about the maternal body and effects that aren't directly inside the uterus.
What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
I want to know what you think of a marriage of 2 different cultures.
Habibi is Egyptian and I am a Latin American girl and we want to get married this year ISA!What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?Nobody Would Even Notice you're Latin American So It's Normal And It Happens A LotWhat do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
Well, you're Latin American, so you are basically like 70% an Egyptian already, just change the details!What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?I agree with the person above me..plus Egyptians are biracial themselves..probably quad- racial..I don't think your African lover will have a prob..go for it as long as you two love each other.
If you love each other just ALLEZ
Besides , we Egyptians accept other cultures simply as we have different cultures already..there won't be any problem .What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?sorry...but this is not that much inter racial
like if you're in us and walked in the street or took the subway...no body will notice anything...middle eastern and latin almost the same race
but when it comes with milk chocolate (black n white ..i mean)
asian and any rounded eyes race
that's a real interracial couple
so if you walked with your egyptian guy in egypt no one will recognize anything till you open your mouth and starts to talk
no habla arabi....no comprenda
adios......lolWhat do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
Egyptians basically love everyone on this earth except Israelies. I hope you have a wonderful life and a healthy marriage.
Oh, and as long as you're in love, you shouldn't care what other things, so if there is disapproval, don't let it get to you!!!
God Bless u both.
am so happy for u n ur words mada me smile.What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
If youre in love it doesnt matter, my husband is Egyptian and Im English!
... I just knew one whose "nick-name" was like yours "sweet(y)-angel". I wish you a sweet and angelic life!
i read be4 that latin american and egyptien r comin from same origin...cause long time ago pharoahs went to latin america and they even biuld some pyramids there..so u and him r the same
I know I am not Egyptian and I think you already know my point of view regarding this matter, sweet angel, I just want to remind you that I need at least a month notice to arrange my flight to witness your wedding :)
Habibi is Egyptian and I am a Latin American girl and we want to get married this year ISA!What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?Nobody Would Even Notice you're Latin American So It's Normal And It Happens A LotWhat do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
Well, you're Latin American, so you are basically like 70% an Egyptian already, just change the details!What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?I agree with the person above me..plus Egyptians are biracial themselves..probably quad- racial..I don't think your African lover will have a prob..go for it as long as you two love each other.
If you love each other just ALLEZ
Besides , we Egyptians accept other cultures simply as we have different cultures already..there won't be any problem .What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?sorry...but this is not that much inter racial
like if you're in us and walked in the street or took the subway...no body will notice anything...middle eastern and latin almost the same race
but when it comes with milk chocolate (black n white ..i mean)
asian and any rounded eyes race
that's a real interracial couple
so if you walked with your egyptian guy in egypt no one will recognize anything till you open your mouth and starts to talk
no habla arabi....no comprenda
adios......lolWhat do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
Egyptians basically love everyone on this earth except Israelies. I hope you have a wonderful life and a healthy marriage.
Oh, and as long as you're in love, you shouldn't care what other things, so if there is disapproval, don't let it get to you!!!
God Bless u both.
am so happy for u n ur words mada me smile.What do Egyptians think of inter racial marriages?
If youre in love it doesnt matter, my husband is Egyptian and Im English!
... I just knew one whose "nick-name" was like yours "sweet(y)-angel". I wish you a sweet and angelic life!
i read be4 that latin american and egyptien r comin from same origin...cause long time ago pharoahs went to latin america and they even biuld some pyramids there..so u and him r the same
I know I am not Egyptian and I think you already know my point of view regarding this matter, sweet angel, I just want to remind you that I need at least a month notice to arrange my flight to witness your wedding :)
What is the difference between inter network and internet?
Internetworking involves connecting two or more distinct computer networks or network segments via a common routing technology. The result is called an internetwork (often shortened to internet).
The most notable example of internetworking is the Internet (capitalized), a network of networks based on many underlying hardware technologies, but unified by an internetworking protocol standard, called the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP).
So in the way you phrased the question there is no difference. If Internet (capital "I") then you are referring to The Internet (www, ftp, etc.)What is the difference between inter network and internet?An internetwork is a collection of individual networks, connected by intermediate networking devices, that functions as a single large network. Internetworking refers to the industry, products, and procedures that meet the challenge of creating and administering internetworks. What is the difference between inter network and internet?intranets only see those local PCs that are connected to it like those at your school or office.It stands alone and by itself The internet is is a world wide connection. What is the difference between inter network and internet?One is abbreviated. 50 points if you can guess which one.
The most notable example of internetworking is the Internet (capitalized), a network of networks based on many underlying hardware technologies, but unified by an internetworking protocol standard, called the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP).
So in the way you phrased the question there is no difference. If Internet (capital "I") then you are referring to The Internet (www, ftp, etc.)What is the difference between inter network and internet?An internetwork is a collection of individual networks, connected by intermediate networking devices, that functions as a single large network. Internetworking refers to the industry, products, and procedures that meet the challenge of creating and administering internetworks. What is the difference between inter network and internet?intranets only see those local PCs that are connected to it like those at your school or office.It stands alone and by itself The internet is is a world wide connection. What is the difference between inter network and internet?One is abbreviated. 50 points if you can guess which one.
During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
I'm saying just for inter-league games. What does the NL have to lose by agreeing to this? Most pitchers can't hit anyways.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?What the NL teams have to lose is that they don't have to pay for a 'big bat' to sit on the bench all year just to play 18 games in interleague.
Plus, it's an advantage to the NL teams because their pitchers are used to hitting. Most aren't great at it of course, but at least can bunt.
If the AL pitchers can't do this, they why try to make it more appealing for them.
If AL teams have guys like Ortiz, Hafner, Thome and Thomas, sitting there because they're defensive liabilities, then that team has to make a choice, the bat and the glove vs neither.
It is a better way to play.
I wish the AL had it actuallyDuring inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
I think it should be in inter league play only because the pitchers are not used to running the bases at all.
I never really liked the DH rule but after witnessing it in inter league play these guys are just not ready to do it. I always thought a pitcher should bat but you can't make a pitcher in the AL run the bases and take BP every day just because he may bat one time in an inter league game all year. You either have it or don't but you can't expect an AL pitcher to be ready for that 1 or 2 time at bat.
You can call me biased as a Yankee fan in seeing a great pitcher of ours go down but it just isn't right for the minimal at bats. Do it one way or the other for all.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?It loses its pride! NL play is the way that real baseball is played! Don't go the Hank Steinbrenner way and say the NL is idiotic for not installing the DH.
Let me tell you something, Babe Ruth won 100 games as a pitcher and is one of the most legendary hitters of all time! So don't give me that "protecting the pitchers" crap, why because some idiot on the Yankess injured himself by running the bases?! Please... If Josh Beckett had done that, Hank would have kept his ****** muppet mouth SHUT!
this is a stupid idea. wah-wah my pitcher got hurt running the freakin' bases, that's his fault, hitting the ball and running the bases is part of the game. If they get hurt running the bases then put them back in T-ball, because that's so pathetic. Seriously, that is that stupid.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?No-Way! Because it is a tradition to have pitchers bat.
xoxo
Hope this helpsDuring inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
the league rules apply to certain parks. thats why the all-star gamehas a DH every other year because its played in an AL park every other year. you cant take 130+ years of history in some parks and just change it like its nothing. its the game, the way it was played for decades, so no you cant change the rules because some guys arent used to swinging a bat
and look at felix hernandez. he hit a grand slam as the only hit he may well ever have as a pitcher. if they were using a DH in shea that night he wouldve never had that once in a lifetime opportunity
and ps im a yanks fan so im pissed wang went down just like everyone else but i dont support what hank said about the NL rules
Yeah, the DH should definitely be used for interleague games...I wish they would get rid of interleague play all together..it is a huge disadvantage for the AL teams going to the NL stadiums and losing the DH...it's a joke.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
Just the opposite, actually. I think the DH should be removed from all interleague play. Think of it this way. When the AL team sets their DH, its a power hitting star whose payed to play about 155 games per year. When the NL team sets their DH, its a 4th outfield bench player who would fill in and have mediocre hitting that wasn't good enough to get them into the regular lineup. The NL team isn't going to pay a power hitting star to play 15 games a year and occasional pinch hitting.
Remember. The pitcher is playing BASEBALL, which involves running bases. The DH is playing BASEBALL, which involves fielding the ball. The Manager is managing BASEBALL, which involves pinch hitting for the pitcher, or having the pitcher bunt the runner forward, or pinch running for the pitcher if he somehow gets on base. The DH idea removes most of these strategies in AL play.
no beacuse then when the A.L pitchers have to bat in the W's they wont have the experience of stepping into the batters box it's good for them to get the practice if they did not want to bat then they should not play baseball go into field hockey or checkers.
Dear Cool Shoes:
The DH should be use in the America league only and the National League should keep their role as their role play baseball old school without the DH.The DH help the America league offensive numbers.It good for baseball that both league that have different ways of playing the game.
Let Go Yankees %26amp; S F Giants #1,
Adam
AL rules apply when they are home team and NL rules apply when they are home team. The rules are fine they way they are right now with no need to change. AL teams have additional hitters on their roster for the DH and NL teams do not. The AL teams would have an offensive advantage over NL teams who have to carry extra pitching in the NL.
When MLB introduced interleague play in 1997, one of the promotional talking points was that this, finally, would enable fans who lived near only one team to see the teams from the other league and how they played.
(This of course was a meaningless lie since all MLB really cared about was the income. But let's use this chocolate hammer against them....)
This was not the case, however, since fans near an NL team would have to watch visiting AL teams bereft of their designated hitters. Likewise, fans near an AL team get to watch some random benchwarmer bat as DH, since the NL doesn't tend to keep a good hitter hanging around for little playing time.
In interleague play, the VISITING team's rules should apply.
NL teams that want to remain "pure" or "true" or whatever can, per the rules, opt not to put a DH in the lineup and let their pitchers hit. Which would be funny!
Anyway... visitor's rules should apply.
my hometown team is the indians so i love seeing our pitchers get an opportunity to bat when we play interleague. its great when u get to see CC Sabathia belt a 440ft homerun out to right field. i think the rule should remain intact.auto parts stores
Plus, it's an advantage to the NL teams because their pitchers are used to hitting. Most aren't great at it of course, but at least can bunt.
If the AL pitchers can't do this, they why try to make it more appealing for them.
If AL teams have guys like Ortiz, Hafner, Thome and Thomas, sitting there because they're defensive liabilities, then that team has to make a choice, the bat and the glove vs neither.
It is a better way to play.
I wish the AL had it actuallyDuring inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
I think it should be in inter league play only because the pitchers are not used to running the bases at all.
I never really liked the DH rule but after witnessing it in inter league play these guys are just not ready to do it. I always thought a pitcher should bat but you can't make a pitcher in the AL run the bases and take BP every day just because he may bat one time in an inter league game all year. You either have it or don't but you can't expect an AL pitcher to be ready for that 1 or 2 time at bat.
You can call me biased as a Yankee fan in seeing a great pitcher of ours go down but it just isn't right for the minimal at bats. Do it one way or the other for all.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?It loses its pride! NL play is the way that real baseball is played! Don't go the Hank Steinbrenner way and say the NL is idiotic for not installing the DH.
Let me tell you something, Babe Ruth won 100 games as a pitcher and is one of the most legendary hitters of all time! So don't give me that "protecting the pitchers" crap, why because some idiot on the Yankess injured himself by running the bases?! Please... If Josh Beckett had done that, Hank would have kept his ****** muppet mouth SHUT!
this is a stupid idea. wah-wah my pitcher got hurt running the freakin' bases, that's his fault, hitting the ball and running the bases is part of the game. If they get hurt running the bases then put them back in T-ball, because that's so pathetic. Seriously, that is that stupid.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?No-Way! Because it is a tradition to have pitchers bat.
xoxo
Hope this helpsDuring inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
the league rules apply to certain parks. thats why the all-star gamehas a DH every other year because its played in an AL park every other year. you cant take 130+ years of history in some parks and just change it like its nothing. its the game, the way it was played for decades, so no you cant change the rules because some guys arent used to swinging a bat
and look at felix hernandez. he hit a grand slam as the only hit he may well ever have as a pitcher. if they were using a DH in shea that night he wouldve never had that once in a lifetime opportunity
and ps im a yanks fan so im pissed wang went down just like everyone else but i dont support what hank said about the NL rules
Yeah, the DH should definitely be used for interleague games...I wish they would get rid of interleague play all together..it is a huge disadvantage for the AL teams going to the NL stadiums and losing the DH...it's a joke.During inter-league play? Should the DH rule be played in both NL as well to protect pitchers?
Just the opposite, actually. I think the DH should be removed from all interleague play. Think of it this way. When the AL team sets their DH, its a power hitting star whose payed to play about 155 games per year. When the NL team sets their DH, its a 4th outfield bench player who would fill in and have mediocre hitting that wasn't good enough to get them into the regular lineup. The NL team isn't going to pay a power hitting star to play 15 games a year and occasional pinch hitting.
Remember. The pitcher is playing BASEBALL, which involves running bases. The DH is playing BASEBALL, which involves fielding the ball. The Manager is managing BASEBALL, which involves pinch hitting for the pitcher, or having the pitcher bunt the runner forward, or pinch running for the pitcher if he somehow gets on base. The DH idea removes most of these strategies in AL play.
no beacuse then when the A.L pitchers have to bat in the W's they wont have the experience of stepping into the batters box it's good for them to get the practice if they did not want to bat then they should not play baseball go into field hockey or checkers.
Dear Cool Shoes:
The DH should be use in the America league only and the National League should keep their role as their role play baseball old school without the DH.The DH help the America league offensive numbers.It good for baseball that both league that have different ways of playing the game.
Let Go Yankees %26amp; S F Giants #1,
Adam
AL rules apply when they are home team and NL rules apply when they are home team. The rules are fine they way they are right now with no need to change. AL teams have additional hitters on their roster for the DH and NL teams do not. The AL teams would have an offensive advantage over NL teams who have to carry extra pitching in the NL.
When MLB introduced interleague play in 1997, one of the promotional talking points was that this, finally, would enable fans who lived near only one team to see the teams from the other league and how they played.
(This of course was a meaningless lie since all MLB really cared about was the income. But let's use this chocolate hammer against them....)
This was not the case, however, since fans near an NL team would have to watch visiting AL teams bereft of their designated hitters. Likewise, fans near an AL team get to watch some random benchwarmer bat as DH, since the NL doesn't tend to keep a good hitter hanging around for little playing time.
In interleague play, the VISITING team's rules should apply.
NL teams that want to remain "pure" or "true" or whatever can, per the rules, opt not to put a DH in the lineup and let their pitchers hit. Which would be funny!
Anyway... visitor's rules should apply.
my hometown team is the indians so i love seeing our pitchers get an opportunity to bat when we play interleague. its great when u get to see CC Sabathia belt a 440ft homerun out to right field. i think the rule should remain intact.
What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
One would think that because of their vulnerability, they would wear more protective clothing on their nether parts. But no, they ended up wearing skirts which are very susceptible to the vagaries of wind, terrain not to mention unwelcome stares and touches. I prefer answers based on physiology and psychology. No flippant wiseacre answers please.What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?short history of pants - pants were invented by the first nomadic tribes that domesticated horses. they lived between the Black and the Caspian seas. it is much easier to ride a horse, and battle against people who can't ride horses when wearing the "new fangled invention" of pants instead of skirts. Becasue before then (and even now in places like scotland and sri lanka) everyone wore pants.
picture a battle scene where one side was on foot and the other side was on horseback. who wins?
From that time until now: pants = power.
It's not that women chose to wear dresses over pants, it's just that pants entered societies via the powerful men who could afford to buy a horse instead of worrying only about subsistence agriculture or whatnot.
Due to ingrained "inter-cultural" misogyny, women were not able to own property (horses). Then it became culturally strange for anyone besides men, whether they owned horses or not, to wear pants.
Sorry to waste your time as the answer is not to do with physiology, but I was just throwing it out there.What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
Traditional clothing such as skirts and dresses is what they are used to wearing--it's what they wore in their homeland. they probably think that women in pants are being strange. There may also be some religious beliefs involved too.
BTW if they wear underwear, their nether parts are not that vulnerable. I don't understand your comment about stares and touches--do you see intercultural women wearing provocative, revealing skirts a lot?What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?To answer this question in an intelligent fashion, one must ask, what is an inter-culturally woman?What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
Ease of peeing is my guess. Lift and go.What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?Are you suggesting that people who are not of mixed race dont gravitate to wearing skirts? Hmm . ..maybe so. I'm about 9 different ones at least supposedly and I definitely prefer skirts. I hate pants. I dont know if you mean short skirts as women who hunt are supposed to have worn? It would be more difficult to hunt in a long skirt .. .it would get caught on branches and thorns. Is anyone just one cultural group anymore--I thought everyone was mixed these daysWhat are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
In many cultures woman are not allowed to wear pants(like jeans) I have no idea why. Dont forget that in the images you see in Jesus's time everyone wore dress like tunics. I think the reason was to cover their nakedness more than functional. Have you seen pictures of people wading through water with long skirts/tunics
Nowadays skirts (especially long skirts) are seeen as more feminine, and the only men wearing skirtlike oufits are Muslim men and Sheiks from UAE and Arab desert like countries.
I suppose the practicalities of wearing "skirts" in a desert environment are that you can shake out the sand easier and possibly and other bug that may have crawled in for protection
In many African countries skirts have to be worn by woman. That why you see the poorest countries on the news and woman are sitting in dirt in their skirts. If they were to wear pants they would get "unwelcome stares and touches"
Possibly in the beginning, skirts were the easiest clothing item to construct (with no sewing machines etc) with animal skins.
picture a battle scene where one side was on foot and the other side was on horseback. who wins?
From that time until now: pants = power.
It's not that women chose to wear dresses over pants, it's just that pants entered societies via the powerful men who could afford to buy a horse instead of worrying only about subsistence agriculture or whatnot.
Due to ingrained "inter-cultural" misogyny, women were not able to own property (horses). Then it became culturally strange for anyone besides men, whether they owned horses or not, to wear pants.
Sorry to waste your time as the answer is not to do with physiology, but I was just throwing it out there.What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
Traditional clothing such as skirts and dresses is what they are used to wearing--it's what they wore in their homeland. they probably think that women in pants are being strange. There may also be some religious beliefs involved too.
BTW if they wear underwear, their nether parts are not that vulnerable. I don't understand your comment about stares and touches--do you see intercultural women wearing provocative, revealing skirts a lot?What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?To answer this question in an intelligent fashion, one must ask, what is an inter-culturally woman?What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
Ease of peeing is my guess. Lift and go.What are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?Are you suggesting that people who are not of mixed race dont gravitate to wearing skirts? Hmm . ..maybe so. I'm about 9 different ones at least supposedly and I definitely prefer skirts. I hate pants. I dont know if you mean short skirts as women who hunt are supposed to have worn? It would be more difficult to hunt in a long skirt .. .it would get caught on branches and thorns. Is anyone just one cultural group anymore--I thought everyone was mixed these daysWhat are the reasons why inter-culturally women generally gravitated to wearing skirts?
In many cultures woman are not allowed to wear pants(like jeans) I have no idea why. Dont forget that in the images you see in Jesus's time everyone wore dress like tunics. I think the reason was to cover their nakedness more than functional. Have you seen pictures of people wading through water with long skirts/tunics
Nowadays skirts (especially long skirts) are seeen as more feminine, and the only men wearing skirtlike oufits are Muslim men and Sheiks from UAE and Arab desert like countries.
I suppose the practicalities of wearing "skirts" in a desert environment are that you can shake out the sand easier and possibly and other bug that may have crawled in for protection
In many African countries skirts have to be worn by woman. That why you see the poorest countries on the news and woman are sitting in dirt in their skirts. If they were to wear pants they would get "unwelcome stares and touches"
Possibly in the beginning, skirts were the easiest clothing item to construct (with no sewing machines etc) with animal skins.
What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
If you did, what did your family and friends say or think about it? I dated several men of a different race than me. I remember my father was not thrilled about it, but accepted it. My mother was fine with it.
Please don't answer, we're all of the same race, the human race, I have no doubt about that.What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?First of all I'm not prejudice!!! I'm a half-breed Native American!! My mom is white and my dad Native!! I wished people would consider what it is going to do to the child...it's been rough being a half-breed...when the Native's get angry at you they call you white...when the white's get angry at you they call you NDN!!! So consider the kids...please!!! I look Native but can tell I'm not full-blood although I've been asked that so I hang with the Natives mostly but do have white friends but find out I am actually on the "Red Road" which makes my white mom angry!! But, I click with the NDN's!!! My folks fought constantly and ended up divorcing and she married a white man and they get along great!!! My dad has passed..his people drove over 100 miles from his reservation to put him away!!!What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
i have had lots of relationships with different races, my parents didnt care, its my life and they are good people.
why should it matter, there are millions of people in mixed marriages all over the worldWhat are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?none of my friends or family approve. when i was younger, i was about free love and thought it was okay. now that i lived a little more, i see where my family and friends were coming from. but once again you live and learn. i have no problems with others dating outside their race but it is not for me anymore.
Im a white women married to a middle eastern man.. ( dont know if you consider that interracial).. Im white and he's brown..
my family are fine with it..What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?Yes, my wife was a mixture, Australian Aborigine and Chinese. Everybody was happy about it, even my grandparents who, given their age, were a little old fashioned. My children all displayed some of their aboriginal ancestry and are partnered by white people whose parents seem fine with those relationships tooWhat are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
I have dated outside my race 3 times. I liked it and found no difference besides family background morals dealing with religons and such. My family and friends didn't see anything wrong with it, in fact they were please to know that there kids isn't close minded. It should be the matter of skin but ,ore of ethic background and morals. My cousin dated outside of her race and though she find it quiten cute and amusing it was then when she married the guy that she found out that their family believes that women she be in the home and the men she be outside working. Not very plz with that at all. She also found out that all the foods she like he didn't like and she had to cook only the stuff he liked. I was wondering did they even dATE. lol
I did and still do.
My family is very supportive; he's a good man and makes me happy so that's all that matters to them.What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
i dated men out of my race before. my parents were ok especially my mom because she is very open minded.
i haven't , but if they are nice people i couldn't care less what colour they are.
and if my children had inter racial partners , no worries, i'd love my grand kids if they were yellow ,black, green , white or purple.
I never have but do know a couple who is inter racial and they have a daughter who is 2 now.It isn't working.They have their differences. I believe people should marry within their race because it seems to work better. Most couples have differences with cultural issues and religion.They are hard issues to solve.Of course there are those couples that have it all together and it does work despite their race. I doubt there is a pat answer and I am sure my opinion is not popular.
like shopping for clothes. does your taste run to quality or cheap.
Being from the south, I was raised to believe it was wrong. I still feel uneasy seeing mixed couples. However when I see the off springs from mixed couple, I can't help but see beautiful, smart children and I believe that we were meant to mix with other nationalities to get the most out of our genes. I believe president Obama is a case in point. I don't like interracial marriages, but the outcome is far more important than my personal feelings.
I am thankful that I was raised with respect for other peoples decisions.
It is not my place to judge others in their relationships.
It is certainly regional as to the responses that one would get.
Countries and locals alike view this in a differant way.
For me do whatever makes you happy.
I dated a native american woman in 1978 for about eight months. Then she dumped me. Then about a year later she called and wanted to get together again. I told her no thanks I am seeing someone else. I think it is matter of personal choice.
It should all be a matter that comes from you intuition. your heart and soul. there is discrimination within ones own race if you are too dark or too light one cannot win...so live life to the fullest the best way you can with a happy heart.
personally i think it's wrong but that is not the current thinking of many other people.
My grandkids are biracial, my son-in-law is a different race than my daughter. I tend to not think about it anymore and if others do, they sure don't say anything. It is a privilege to have my world widen in knowledge and experience.
My oldest son recently married a Filipino woman.
I never once considered the race issue.
But, as time goes on, I have now found myself wondering about future children.
I know the world is cruel. I want the best for my grandchildren. If they are discriminated against because of their skin, it would break my heart.
My children were raised to believe that we are all equal.
Apparently I was successful doing that.
Interracial dating is fairly commonplace these days and I have no objections to it. Marriage is difficult and 1 out of 2 fails. I would say that chances are better without having to overcome the difference in race or religion, but many people have successfully managed it. I am for whatever makes the couple happy as long as their children do not have to suffer for any decisions made.
If the two are in love and happy with each other. Hey, what can I say? It really is not any of my business. It is ok with me. I only wish them the best.
Please don't answer, we're all of the same race, the human race, I have no doubt about that.What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?First of all I'm not prejudice!!! I'm a half-breed Native American!! My mom is white and my dad Native!! I wished people would consider what it is going to do to the child...it's been rough being a half-breed...when the Native's get angry at you they call you white...when the white's get angry at you they call you NDN!!! So consider the kids...please!!! I look Native but can tell I'm not full-blood although I've been asked that so I hang with the Natives mostly but do have white friends but find out I am actually on the "Red Road" which makes my white mom angry!! But, I click with the NDN's!!! My folks fought constantly and ended up divorcing and she married a white man and they get along great!!! My dad has passed..his people drove over 100 miles from his reservation to put him away!!!What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
i have had lots of relationships with different races, my parents didnt care, its my life and they are good people.
why should it matter, there are millions of people in mixed marriages all over the worldWhat are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?none of my friends or family approve. when i was younger, i was about free love and thought it was okay. now that i lived a little more, i see where my family and friends were coming from. but once again you live and learn. i have no problems with others dating outside their race but it is not for me anymore.
Im a white women married to a middle eastern man.. ( dont know if you consider that interracial).. Im white and he's brown..
my family are fine with it..What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?Yes, my wife was a mixture, Australian Aborigine and Chinese. Everybody was happy about it, even my grandparents who, given their age, were a little old fashioned. My children all displayed some of their aboriginal ancestry and are partnered by white people whose parents seem fine with those relationships tooWhat are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
I have dated outside my race 3 times. I liked it and found no difference besides family background morals dealing with religons and such. My family and friends didn't see anything wrong with it, in fact they were please to know that there kids isn't close minded. It should be the matter of skin but ,ore of ethic background and morals. My cousin dated outside of her race and though she find it quiten cute and amusing it was then when she married the guy that she found out that their family believes that women she be in the home and the men she be outside working. Not very plz with that at all. She also found out that all the foods she like he didn't like and she had to cook only the stuff he liked. I was wondering did they even dATE. lol
I did and still do.
My family is very supportive; he's a good man and makes me happy so that's all that matters to them.What are your thoughts on inter racial dating/marriage? Have you dated or married someone of a different race?
i dated men out of my race before. my parents were ok especially my mom because she is very open minded.
i haven't , but if they are nice people i couldn't care less what colour they are.
and if my children had inter racial partners , no worries, i'd love my grand kids if they were yellow ,black, green , white or purple.
I never have but do know a couple who is inter racial and they have a daughter who is 2 now.It isn't working.They have their differences. I believe people should marry within their race because it seems to work better. Most couples have differences with cultural issues and religion.They are hard issues to solve.Of course there are those couples that have it all together and it does work despite their race. I doubt there is a pat answer and I am sure my opinion is not popular.
like shopping for clothes. does your taste run to quality or cheap.
Being from the south, I was raised to believe it was wrong. I still feel uneasy seeing mixed couples. However when I see the off springs from mixed couple, I can't help but see beautiful, smart children and I believe that we were meant to mix with other nationalities to get the most out of our genes. I believe president Obama is a case in point. I don't like interracial marriages, but the outcome is far more important than my personal feelings.
I am thankful that I was raised with respect for other peoples decisions.
It is not my place to judge others in their relationships.
It is certainly regional as to the responses that one would get.
Countries and locals alike view this in a differant way.
For me do whatever makes you happy.
I dated a native american woman in 1978 for about eight months. Then she dumped me. Then about a year later she called and wanted to get together again. I told her no thanks I am seeing someone else. I think it is matter of personal choice.
It should all be a matter that comes from you intuition. your heart and soul. there is discrimination within ones own race if you are too dark or too light one cannot win...so live life to the fullest the best way you can with a happy heart.
personally i think it's wrong but that is not the current thinking of many other people.
My grandkids are biracial, my son-in-law is a different race than my daughter. I tend to not think about it anymore and if others do, they sure don't say anything. It is a privilege to have my world widen in knowledge and experience.
My oldest son recently married a Filipino woman.
I never once considered the race issue.
But, as time goes on, I have now found myself wondering about future children.
I know the world is cruel. I want the best for my grandchildren. If they are discriminated against because of their skin, it would break my heart.
My children were raised to believe that we are all equal.
Apparently I was successful doing that.
Interracial dating is fairly commonplace these days and I have no objections to it. Marriage is difficult and 1 out of 2 fails. I would say that chances are better without having to overcome the difference in race or religion, but many people have successfully managed it. I am for whatever makes the couple happy as long as their children do not have to suffer for any decisions made.
If the two are in love and happy with each other. Hey, what can I say? It really is not any of my business. It is ok with me. I only wish them the best.
What does a man's sperm count need to be in order to have a successful at home inter vaginal insemenation?
At home insemination is not thought to be any more effective than having sexual intercourse . . . timed right, a healthy couple has a 20 - 25% chance of success with well-timed insemination per cycle. Here is a good link for how-to info:
http://www.pinelandpress.com/faq/homeins鈥?/a>
If sperm count or motility is an issue, an IUI would be more effective (but also more expensive). An IUI is different because they wash the sperm leaving behind the best swimmers, use a catheter to inject the semen into your cervix (you cannot do this at home due to needing medical experience and the sperm sample must be properly prepared to avoid infections). Having the sperm in your cervix is getting it much closer to where it needs to go.
Hope this helps!What does a man's sperm count need to be in order to have a successful at home inter vaginal insemenation?I don't think the sperm count really matters, it just depends if the sperm are lazy or not. It only takes one!
HELP
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
http://www.pinelandpress.com/faq/homeins鈥?/a>
If sperm count or motility is an issue, an IUI would be more effective (but also more expensive). An IUI is different because they wash the sperm leaving behind the best swimmers, use a catheter to inject the semen into your cervix (you cannot do this at home due to needing medical experience and the sperm sample must be properly prepared to avoid infections). Having the sperm in your cervix is getting it much closer to where it needs to go.
Hope this helps!What does a man's sperm count need to be in order to have a successful at home inter vaginal insemenation?I don't think the sperm count really matters, it just depends if the sperm are lazy or not. It only takes one!
HELP
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)